MyFox
 

Bob_Tarlau's Blog

by Bob_Tarlau from West Los Angeles

Last Post 8 days, 10 hours Ago


The Hillary Clinton-Barack Obama duel has been filling most of this blog in recent weeks… enough to where some of you loyal readers might be thinking: Hey, what about that Republican fellow who has already secured his party’s nomination? You’re right, so I’m blogging this week about Senator John McCain.

He’s long been a GOP agitator, but now McCain is easing into the role of its newfound leader.   He has met abroad with world leaders, intensified fundraising and taken control of the party apparatus. He is thinking about running mates and is introducing himself to the country. He's also made a few missteps and watched a challenging political terrain that favors Democrats grow more troublesome for Republicans.

A CBS/New York Times poll at the start of this month found Americans are more dissatisfied with the country’s direction than at any time since a major poll started asking about the subject in the early 1990s. Eighty-one per cent say they believe “things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.” That 81 per cent is up from 69 per cent a year ago… and 35 percent in early 2002.

McCain seemed to be addressing that downbeat view when, on Thursday, he called for federal aid for well-meaning homeowners who can't pay their mortgages. That was clearly an attempt to fend off criticism that he has been indifferent to the housing crisis and the market upheaval it has spawned. He sketched out a plan that would cost up to $10 billion to help 200,000 to 400,000 homeowners trade burdensome mortgages for manageable loans. As usual in these kinds of overtures, nothing said about where the money would come from and exactly who would be eligible. Hillary Clinton was quick to call the McCain plan a halfhearted version of her own efforts. And from Obama: "I'm glad he's finally decided to offer a plan. Better late than never."

McCain certainly knows what he’s up against in trying to keep the White House in Republican hands in spite of the dust kicked up by the most unpopular President in at least a generation. Yet in the weeks since he clinched the GOP nomination, his White House campaign has entered an important new phase and he’s managed to move forward on all fronts — from message to mechanics — to position himself for the November election.

There have been speed bumps on the road. McCain faced fallout from an endorsement by a televangelist who has made anti-Catholic comments and confronted questions about his ties to lobbyists. He invited criticism with a speech that derided aggressive federal intervention in the housing crisis but offered no immediate relief for homeowners threatened with foreclosure. And, he mistakenly said Iran was allowing al-Qaida fighters into its country to be trained and returned to Iraq. On the 40th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s assassination, he found himself having to apologize for initially opposing establishment of a national holiday marking MLK’s birthday.

In spite of the hurdles, McCain is saying: "I'm glad to be where we are. We're going to keep working hard." Polls put him in strong contention against either Clinton or Obama in a head-to-head match up. And McCain has the luxury of focusing on the general election while his Democratic rivals remain embroiled in their tight contest. And each day we hear Clinton and Obama assail McCain in hopes of appearing to be the strongest one to take him on in November.

Obama is fond of saying: "John McCain wants to continue the war in Iraq. I want to end it." And one of Clinton’s Pennsylvania TV ads proclaims: "John McCain just said the government shouldn't take any real action on the housing crisis, he'd let the phone keep ringing."

As Democrats bicker, these are the areas McCain needs to keep his focus on:

+ Money: Fundraising is arguably his biggest weakness and, thus, should be his highest priority. He raised only $11 million in February to a combined $80 million for Clinton and Obama, and has been slow to sign up many of Bush's big donors. Obama reported raising $40 million in March; Clinton said she raised $20 million. McCain is likely to surpass his February total but still trail his rivals. He held dozens of fundraisers last month and set up joint fundraising accounts with the Republican National Committee to encourage donations.

+ Unity: Trying to heal wounds from a divisive GOP primary is a high priority for a candidate who has spent decades bucking the party on issues that resonate with conservatives. In hopes of getting critics to swing behind him, McCain recently appeared with Bush in the White House Rose Garden and received Nancy Reagan's endorsement. He also campaigned with former GOP rival Mitt Romney to show solidarity. He’ll also need to play to the party’s middle-roaders and political independents… a tough tight-rope act especially given his continuing hard sell for the Iraq war.

+ Message: Speaking to a broader electorate, McCain, a former Navy pilot held prisoner during the Vietnam War, has cast himself as an experienced wartime commander in chief and statesman with his own vision, despite Democratic efforts to paint him as a Bush clone. McCain visited the Middle East, including Iraq, and Europe, where he met with allies. Stateside, he staged a weeklong biographical tour and began an ad campaign.

+ Vice President. McCain has a list of some 20 names from which he could choose a running mate and says he's in the "embryonic stages" of selecting someone. Aides say little to no significant vetting has occurred. The goal is to select someone before the nominating convention in early September, and McCain says he's mindful of the enhanced importance of the task because of his age. He is 71 and would be the oldest president elected.

Do you have any thoughts on who McCain should be considering for VP? Condi Rice perhaps? There sure was a lot of talk about that this week… but I’m tossing the chances of that happening into the “pretty slim” box.

I’ll be blogging at you again next Friday for another THIS POLITICAL WEEK. In the meantime, I’ll be looking forward to your comments.

Cheers, Bob

17 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 17
Page 1 of 1
statueman read my blog view my photos
Apr 11, 2008 | 10:01 AM

I briefly remember hearing that Condi Rice said she's not even considering it. But of course they all say that...

But it would kill two birds with one stone. A woman and a uhhhh... Minority. Starting to look like an episode of 'Good Times'.

The democrates won't be able to paint Mc Cain into a Bush like they're thinking. Mc Cain wasn't a National Guardsman who never went to war and he never had a drinking problem and well, can you say...

POW-MIA?

In our history we've never switched horses mid stream. We're at war and what we really need is some Heroic Hollywood personalities to go to Iraq and Afghanistan but that's another blog.

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 11, 2008 | 10:39 AM

How about L.A. Mayor Tony "Family Man" Villar? They'd be a great team for the OPEN BORDERS ZEALOTS. The big problem though is the divisive, inflammatory, and detrimental speech that will be spewed out against the American Comminity in hoisting this agenda upon the American taxpayer.

McCain/Kennedy

STAY HOME '08

craftyguy read my blog
Apr 11, 2008 | 7:20 PM

i would like to see McCain pick Colon Powell as his running mate it would be an unbeatable team who in their right mind vote against two heroes ?only total liberals with no patriotism as that's what they are getting from both Obama and Clinton..Clinton represents the past liberal failures and lies Obama represents the now liberal failures to come with his stupid daydreams with no plans on how to achieve them..except at taxpayers expense..the usual democrat tax and spend mentality that ruins this country..

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 11, 2008 | 11:52 PM

I saw Tony "Family Man" Villar at the Laker game on T.V.. The interviewer asked him what he's going to be doing this summer? He said, "working with the kids, it's all about the kids, and asking the employers to hire the kids this summer". He must have meant the kids like Pedro Espinosa, or that kid who tagged up that bus window at his photo-op for the opening of the Orange Line. Surely, he didn't mean kids like Jamiel Shaw Jr.. We already know what he thinks about kids like him...

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 12, 2008 | 12:01 PM

Maybe former president Jimmy Carter can get to visit the Prime Minister of Israel next week. Whaddya think Bob?

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 13, 2008 | 2:31 AM

Uh, Mr. T you are back on the candidates? Whatever happened to a thing called other parties and a write-in candidate? Is there any way as a news director/producer you might interview other parties and candidates like the Constitution Party in California and start finally recognizing others who might be better fit for the job. Until you news people get your heads out of the clouds and take a look around at everything else, you only are a part of the problem then the solution. Try using your position to do some good for a change rather then blogging about the same crap! Just a hint from a fellow American citizen.

Bob_Tarlau read my blog view my photos
Apr 13, 2008 | 10:05 AM

Sebar -- Since you appear to back a minor party candidate for President, please enlighten us with your specific endorsement and the reasons for it.

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 13, 2008 | 6:05 PM

A "Minor Party" candidate? Boy Sebar, that's rubbin' your nose in it. They don't understand when you correctly point out that they are the problem. Since the passage of Prop. 187, Democrats and Republicans have re-registered as Decline-to-State(D/S) voters at a 7.2% and 3.8% clip, respectively. The percentage of D/S voters in California is now up to 25%. They're losing their grip just like the spoksholes for The Dinosaur Media. Don't tell anybody who you're gong to vote for....keep them guessing.

Now, which New Direction Democrats and Republicans are supporting JAMIEL'S LAW in the City of Los Angeles? That's the real issue here in SOCAL.

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:01 PM

Mr. T, you goading question to me is exactly the problem I pointed out, in fact you really stepped in deep doo-doo here, cause your question to me exactly points out, the crux of the issue at hand. You as a member of the media in your question have displayed that the media only recognizes the Democrats or Republicans and every other political party that party's philosophy be damned big time. Perhaps if you started recognizing other political parties instead of trying to be so short sighted and recognize only two political parties, and others followed your real genuine and caring lead in taking those actions as a real American, you wouldn't be strolling blindly down a dark path....con't

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:03 PM

Did you ever think my friend of waking up and starting to realize that your comment above is the reason this country has issues. Maybe you ought to start seriously thinking about if you will have freedom of the press from any of the three candidate losers. You might become aware that your freedoms like mine are in grave jeopardy. So I highly advise you and the rest of the media to start recognizing and showing other political parties or you will locked in a phony political system that has destroyed what the founders gave us. You my friend are in a position to help foster change and also your many competitive media friends in the news as well. Want to fix the problem, show that there are alternatives to both of the corrupted parties, or later on when you have no country, don't come whining back to people saying what you "COULD" have done.

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:09 PM

http://www.constitutionparty.com/

That's the main website. For the Party's agenda and its mission statement why don't you read what they are about, before you step on fellow Conservatives and also proudly, real Americans.

http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:17 PM

Here's a few more from this party...

Under no circumstances would we commit U.S. forces to serve under any foreign flag or command. We are opposed to any New World Order, and we reject U.S. participation in or a relinquishing of command to any foreign authority.

steadfastly oppose American participation in any form of world government organization, including any world court under United Nations auspices;

There is no constitutional basis for foreign aid. These expenditures have won us no friends, and constitute a major drain on the resources of our taxpayers.

And that is just the start...They have it right as opposed to John McCain, Hillary and Hussein Obama who want to piss on you and this country.

Bob_Tarlau read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:20 PM

Thanks for the link.. and I promised to look at what and who the Constitution Party in California is offering. Always illuminating to read your comments and while you sometimes have issues with mine (that's what blogs are all about of course), I always appreciate you taking time to send yours.

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:23 PM

Here is a few more for you Mr. T.

The right to keep and bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the Constitution; it may not properly be infringed upon or denied.

We affirm the integrity of the international borders of the United States and the Constitutional authority and duty of the federal government to guard and to protect those borders, including the regulation of the numbers and of the qualifications of immigrants into the country.

We oppose the abuse of the H-1B and L-1 visa provisions of the immigration act which are displacing American workers with foreign.

We oppose legislation and administrative action utilizing asset forfeiture laws which enable the confiscation of the private property of persons not involved in the crime.

Article I of the Bill of Rights reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

We oppose all international trade agreements which have the effect of diminishing America's economic self-sufficiency and of exporting jobs, the loss of which impoverishes American families, undermines American communities, and diminishes America's capacity for economic self-reliance, and the provision of national defense.

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:26 PM

How about it Mr. T, why don't you start considering all the alternative parties rather then the phony two party crap system and the worst candidates for any office which they foist upon people. I just posted the two paragraphs above to show you something about this third Conservative and very traditionally American party. By the way while I am not Christian, I do embrace this party because they are inclusive of all "LEGITIMATE" peaceful religions, and the freedom to practice those religions while remembering where this country's roots were originally based on and founded by.

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 14, 2008 | 12:29 PM

Thank you Mr. T, you should see who all of the parties are an as a honorable member of the news media provide the public service of letting voters know what alternatives they have. By opening up alternatives you lessen the chance of losing your country to corruption, and worse. So thanks for taking the time to perhaps start showing the parties to the public and the party philosophies. By doing that, the alternatives may not remain a minority party, and maybe they will fix what is dreadfully broken and disintegrating.

ddain read my blog view my photos
Apr 16, 2008 | 2:10 PM

Hi Bob...been a while since I chimed in on your blog.

I have no idea who McCain should select because I don't know who the future of the Republican party is. Unlike the Democrats, I can't figure out who is young, and perhaps up and coming within the party who should get this exposure of being VP. This is something Bush should have done instead of going with that dinosaur Cheney for eight years. I don't think Rice is the answer though, I just don't see people voting for her in a general election. Can you tell me what she has done a Secretary of State in the past four years that could be considered an accomplishment?

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Bob_Tarlau

I'm a senior producer with KTTV Fox 11 -- doing investigative and feature pieces for the 10P news and half hour documentaries on subjects light to heavy. I've been in the TV news biz as a producer for over 40 years.

Member Since: 7/20/2006