Jul 3, 2008 | 8:22 AM
Category:
News
FROM: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/2003052
8-9.html
MAY 2003
President Signs Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
“The benefits of the Jobs and Growth Act will also go to investors. The top capital gains tax rate will be reduced by 25 percent, which will encourage more investment and risk-taking, and that will help in job creation.”
“…reducing the tax rate on dividends will also increase the wealth effect around America and will help our markets.”
“This law reflects a common sense economic principle: The best way to have more jobs is to help the people who create new jobs,..”
“When people have more money, they can spend it on goods and services. And in our society, when they demand an additional good or a service, somebody will produce the good or a service. And when somebody produces that good or a service, it means somebody is more likely to be able to find a job.”
“Increased hiring happens gradually, but we're on the path to greater job creation across this country.”
“The bill I'm going to sign provides opportunity for millions of Americans across this country. And the more opportunity there is, the more likely it is somebody is going to find work in this country.”
“Yet other steps are also needed. We must hold federal spending to a responsible level.”
“Our country must get a handle on rising health care costs.”
“We're aggressively implementing higher standards in our public schools so that every child -- every child -- learns to read and write and add and subtract.”
“We're building on the strengths of our economy so that everybody who wants to work can find a job in this great country.”
REALITY CHECK:
1) The stock market (DJIA) - the average yearly increase during the bush administration is less than 1% per year. Going back to Roosevelt, this is better than only Carter (-1%) & Nixon (-2%)
2)The unemployment rate was 3.9% in December 2000, the month before bush took office. It is now 5.5%.
3)Total employment has grown at a slower pace than under any President since Eisenhower, except for 1 - bush #1.
Employers cut jobs for sixth straight month
By JEANNINE AVERSA,
AP
Posted: 2008-07-03 09:03:42
FULL ARTICLE @ http://news.aol.com/story/_a/employers-cut-jobs-for-six
th-straight/n20080703090309990013
WASHINGTON (AP) - Employers cut payrolls by 62,000 in June, the sixth straight month of nationwide job losses, underscoring the economy's fragile state. The unemployment rate held steady at 5.5 percent.
The latest snapshot of business conditions, released by the Labor Department on Thursday, showed continued caution on the part of employers who are chafing under high energy prices and are uncertain about how long the economy will be stuck in a sluggish mode, reflecting fallout from housing, credit and financial troubles.
The jobless rate spiked to 5.5 percent in May. That marked the biggest over-the-month increase in two decades and left the rate at its highest since October 2004.
Job losses in both April and May turned out to be considerably deeper than had been thought. Payrolls dropped by 67,000 in April, versus the 28,000 previously reported. And, losses in May came to 62,000, rather than the 49,000 initially estimated.
So far this year, the economy has lost a total of 438,00 jobs, an average of 73,000 a month.
Private analysts predict the economy will continue to shed jobs in the months ahead, pushing the unemployment rate higher.
The number of unemployed people in June was 8.5 million, up from 7 million a year ago.
In a separate report from the department, the number of newly laid off people signing up for unemployment insurance rose sharply last week. New applications jumped by 16,000 to 404,000, the highest level since late March. The increase was bigger than economists were expecting; they were forecasting claims to rise to around 385,000.
Oil prices on Wednesday hit a new record above $144 a barrel, while gasoline prices reached a new nationwide high of $4.092 a gallon on average, according to AAA, the Oil Price Information Service and Wright Express.
Economists expect the unemployment rate to hit 6 percent or higher early next year, even if the economy were to show better growth. Companies will be reluctant to ramp up hiring until they feel certain the economy will stay on firmer footing.
Jul 3, 2008 | 8:17 AM
Category:
News
FROM: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/2003052
8-9.html
MAY 2003
President Signs Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
“The benefits of the Jobs and Growth Act will also go to investors. The top capital gains tax rate will be reduced by 25 percent, which will encourage more investment and risk-taking, and that will help in job creation.”
“…reducing the tax rate on dividends will also increase the wealth effect around America and will help our markets.”
“This law reflects a common sense economic principle: The best way to have more jobs is to help the people who create new jobs,..”
“When people have more money, they can spend it on goods and services. And in our society, when they demand an additional good or a service, somebody will produce the good or a service. And when somebody produces that good or a service, it means somebody is more likely to be able to find a job.”
“Increased hiring happens gradually, but we're on the path to greater job creation across this country.”
“The bill I'm going to sign provides opportunity for millions of Americans across this country. And the more opportunity there is, the more likely it is somebody is going to find work in this country.”
“Yet other steps are also needed. We must hold federal spending to a responsible level.”
“Our country must get a handle on rising health care costs.”
“We're aggressively implementing higher standards in our public schools so that every child -- every child -- learns to read and write and add and subtract.”
“We're building on the strengths of our economy so that everybody who wants to work can find a job in this great country.”
REALITY CHECK:
1) The stock market (DJIA) - the average yearly increase during the bush administration is less than 1% per year. Going back to Roosevelt, this is better than only Carter (-1%) & Nixon (-2%)
2)The unemployment rate was 3.9% in December 2000, the month before bush took office. It is now 5.5%.
3)Total employment has grown at a slower pace than under any President since Eisenhower, except for 1 - bush #1.
Employers cut jobs for sixth straight month
By JEANNINE AVERSA,
AP
Posted: 2008-07-03 09:03:42
FULL ARTICLE @ http://news.aol.com/story/_a/employers-cut-jobs-for-six
th-straight/n20080703090309990013
WASHINGTON (AP) - Employers cut payrolls by 62,000 in June, the sixth straight month of nationwide job losses, underscoring the economy's fragile state. The unemployment rate held steady at 5.5 percent.
The latest snapshot of business conditions, released by the Labor Department on Thursday, showed continued caution on the part of employers who are chafing under high energy prices and are uncertain about how long the economy will be stuck in a sluggish mode, reflecting fallout from housing, credit and financial troubles.
The jobless rate spiked to 5.5 percent in May. That marked the biggest over-the-month increase in two decades and left the rate at its highest since October 2004.
Job losses in both April and May turned out to be considerably deeper than had been thought. Payrolls dropped by 67,000 in April, versus the 28,000 previously reported. And, losses in May came to 62,000, rather than the 49,000 initially estimated.
So far this year, the economy has lost a total of 438,00 jobs, an average of 73,000 a month.
Private analysts predict the economy will continue to shed jobs in the months ahead, pushing the unemployment rate higher.
The number of unemployed people in June was 8.5 million, up from 7 million a year ago.
In a separate report from the department, the number of newly laid off people signing up for unemployment insurance rose sharply last week. New applications jumped by 16,000 to 404,000, the highest level since late March. The increase was bigger than economists were expecting; they were forecasting claims to rise to around 385,000.
Oil prices on Wednesday hit a new record above $144 a barrel, while gasoline prices reached a new nationwide high of $4.092 a gallon on average, according to AAA, the Oil Price Information Service and Wright Express.
Economists expect the unemployment rate to hit 6 percent or higher early next year, even if the economy were to show better growth. Companies will be reluctant to ramp up hiring until they feel certain the economy will stay on firmer footing.
Jul 2, 2008 | 10:07 AM
Category:
News
Jul 2, 2008 | 10:06 AM
Category:
News
Jul 2, 2008 | 9:52 AM
Category:
News
Jul 2, 2008 | 9:50 AM
Category:
News
Jul 1, 2008 | 4:20 PM
Category:
News
Barclays warns of disaster as Fed loses all credibility
By cpowell
Created 2008-06-27 02:02
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
The Telegraph, London
Friday, June 27, 2008
FULL ARTICLE AT: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/
2008/06/27/cnbarclays127.xml
Barclays Capital has advised clients to batten down the hatches for a worldwide financial storm, warning that the US Federal Reserve has allowed the inflation genie out of the bottle and let its credibility fall "below zero."
"We're in a nasty environment," said Tim Bond, the bank's chief equity strategist. "There is an inflation shock under way. This is going to be very negative for financial assets. We are going into tortoise mood and are retreating into our shell. Investors will do well if they can preserve their wealth."
Barclays Capital said in its closely-watched Global Outlook that US headline inflation would hit 5.5pc by August and the Fed will have to raise interest rates six times by the end of next year to prevent a wage-spiral. If it hesitates, the bond markets will take matters into their own hands. "This is the first test for central banks in 30 years and they have fluffed it. They have zero credibility, and the Fed is negative if that's possible. It has lost all credibility," said Mr Bond.
Jul 1, 2008 | 4:18 PM
Category:
News
Barclays warns of disaster as Fed loses all credibility
By cpowell
Created 2008-06-27 02:02
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
The Telegraph, London
Friday, June 27, 2008
FULL ARTICLE AT: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/
2008/06/27/cnbarclays127.xml
Barclays Capital has advised clients to batten down the hatches for a worldwide financial storm, warning that the US Federal Reserve has allowed the inflation genie out of the bottle and let its credibility fall "below zero."
"We're in a nasty environment," said Tim Bond, the bank's chief equity strategist. "There is an inflation shock under way. This is going to be very negative for financial assets. We are going into tortoise mood and are retreating into our shell. Investors will do well if they can preserve their wealth."
Barclays Capital said in its closely-watched Global Outlook that US headline inflation would hit 5.5pc by August and the Fed will have to raise interest rates six times by the end of next year to prevent a wage-spiral. If it hesitates, the bond markets will take matters into their own hands. "This is the first test for central banks in 30 years and they have fluffed it. They have zero credibility, and the Fed is negative if that's possible. It has lost all credibility," said Mr Bond.
Jul 1, 2008 | 8:37 AM
Category:
Political
Somebody posted the following email making the rounds among the right wing zealot web sites. Hilariousy, whoever wrote this doesn't think that their fellow right wingers have enough intelligence to even prepare a Form 1040EZ, & sadly, from the cut & pastes & the comments posted they are correct. Yes, the dumbing of America can be humorous.
Taxes...Whether Democrat or a Republican you will find these
statistics enlightening and amazing.
http://www.taxfound ation.org/ publications/ show/151. html
Taxes under Clinton Taxes under Bush 2008
Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - t ax $12,500
Sing le making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K - tax $16,80 0 Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250
Both democratic candidates will return to the higher tax rates
It is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above
think Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest
President ever. If Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they
will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that
fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen. This is
like the movie, The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of
some money and they don't even know what happened.
This is nothing more then normal typical right wing zealot BS - throw out crap & hope someone believes it. Whoever wrote this is either a lame little liar, or is just plain stupid enough to write about a subject he knows nothing about.
The writer of this crap certainly showed his complete lack of knowledge concerning income taxes. He listed a link: www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html
knowing that some will blindly believe that his following calculations are shown on that web site. What the link actually brings you to is a report titled “Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History“ from 1913-2008. It shows all the tax brackets for each year, but it does not, for example, say how much tax a single taxpayer making 30K actually paid any year. Here is where the laughs really take off. He claims:
Taxes under Clinton 1999 Taxes under Bush 2008
Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - tax $12,500
Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250
ALL OF THESE AMOUNTS ARE INCORRECT!
Let’s examine one of the claims - that in 1999, a single taxpayer making 30K paid income taxes of $8,400. The writer looked at the 1999 tax brackets showing that 30K for a single taxpayer was in the 28% bracket. So he multiplied $30,000 times 28%, and claimed $8,400 of taxes was paid. FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!
First, the writer doesn’t even know that tax brackets are based on taxable income, not what someone makes. In 1999, the single standard deduction was $4,300 & 1 personal exemption was $2,750. So this single taxpayer making 30K had taxable income of $22,950.
So this single taxpayer who made 30K in 1999 was actually taxed on $22,950 (or less if he itemized deductions) which was taxed @ 15%. Therefore his tax was $3,446, not $8,400.
Secondly, the writer thinks that if your total income figure is within a higher tax bracket, then all your income is taxed at that rate. MORE FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!
The reality though is that even if you make a $million, your taxable income is taxed progressively up the brackets.
Take the claim that a single taxpayer making 50K paid $14,000 in taxes in 1999. The writer took this whole $50,000 & multiplied it times 28% This taxpayer actually had taxable income of $42,950 (even less if he itemized). Even though this $42,950 falls in the 28% bracket, the first $25,750 was taxed at 15%. His income tax was $8,686, not $14,000 as claimed.
ALL of the numbers in his BS are not even close to reality. He claims the single taxpayer making 30K is paying $3,900 per year less than in 1999 ($4,500 in 2008 compared to $8,400 in 1999), as I said - NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Are the numbers for the same income less in 2008, than in 1999? YES. For example, the single taxpayer making $30,000 paid $690 less in 2008 than in 1999. Anyone who thinks this taxpayer isn’t paying back more in increased local or state taxes or fees or rate increases, think again. For example, when U.S. Treasury revenue declined due to the tax cuts, less federal money was sent to the states. One of Jeb Bush’s solutions was to reduce the percentage of local school taxes that the state paid. You now make that up by paying a greater percentage of local school taxes. In other words your property taxes increased to help offset your income tax cut. The politicians want you to disregard everything else, & just see what happened on your 1040. Sadly, some are fooled this way.
The BS continues with:
“If Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen.”
Now either the writer just blindly believes any propaganda that sounds good to him, or he is simply mistaken, or he’s an outright liar. Neither of the Democratic candidates are saying they will repeal the tax cuts “of the people that fall into the categories above” (This nonsense specifically stated income of $125,000 or less).
Clinton’s plan for income taxes is to “Increase on income over $250,000. Make the current (Bush tax cut) rates for "middle class" families permanent.” Also “Would create a matching refundable tax credit for contributions made to 401(k)s.”
Obama’s plan is “"Repeal Bush's tax cuts for top 1%. Eliminate income taxes on seniors earning $50,000 per year or less.”
So the reality is “the people that fall into the categories above” would do better under Clinton’s or Obama’s plans, not worse as the scare tactic propaganda claims.
BTW - Clinton’s & Obama’s plans are also on the Tax Foundation’s web site @ http://www.taxfoundation.org/candidates08/compare/a>
Guess the writer just happened to miss that page.
Jun 29, 2008 | 6:37 AM
Category:
News
As you read the following, remember this:
In January 2006, per the Energy Information Administration (eia.doe.gov), the average of the weekly reports on gas prices was $2.32
FROM:http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm
/20911/sec_id/20911
The Oil bubble is largely the product of uncontrolled speculation by hedge funds, US pension funds and oil patch principals like T. Boone Pickens in the oil commodity futures and derivative markets. It has been fostered by two exemptions granted by the chief regulator of the US commodity markets, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission created by the Commodity Exchange Act of 1974 (CEA). The first exemption was, ironically, that granted to Enron in 2000 that enabled Over The Counter (OTC) energy derivatives trading. The second occurred in 2006 when, according to Business Week, the CFTC allowed ”unlimited speculation through a swaps loophole that exempted Wall Street investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch from reporting requirements and limits on trading positions that are required of other investors to the oil derivative traders on Wall Street vis a vis the ‘swaps’ exemption.” According to the Treasury Department, the top five Investment banks who dominate swap dealing in oil futures include: Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC America Holdings and Wachovia.
Witness this comment from the Engdahl report about how trading on the London-based ICE compounded the Enron loophole:
In January 2006, the Bush Administration’s CFTC permitted the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the leading operator of electronic energy exchanges, to use its trading terminals in the United States for the trading of US crude oil futures on the ICE futures exchange in London – called “ICE Futures.”
Persons within the United States seeking to trade key US energy commodities – US crude oil, gasoline, and heating oil futures – are able to avoid all US market oversight or reporting requirements by routing their trades through the ICE Futures exchange in London instead of the NYMEX in New York.
Is that not elegant? The US Government energy futures regulator, CFTC opened the way to the present unregulated and highly opaque oil futures speculation. It may just be coincidence that the present CEO of NYMEX, James Newsome, who also sits on the Dubai Exchange, is a former chairman of the US CFTC. In Washington doors revolve quite smoothly between private and public posts.
In January 2006 when the CFTC allowed the ICE Futures the gaping exception, oil prices were trading in the range of $59-60 a barrel. Today some two years later we see prices tapping $120 and trend upwards
FROM:http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&ai
d=9042
The chief market strategist for one of the world’s leading oil industry banks, David Kelly, of J.P. Morgan Funds, recently admitted something telling to the Washington Post, “One of the things I think is very important to realize is that the growth in the world oil consumption is not that strong."
Just a few days earlier, Lehman Brothers, a Wall Street investment bank had said that the current oil price bubble was coming to an end. Michael Waldron, the bank's chief oil strategist, was quoted in Britain's Daily Telegraph on Apr. 24 saying, "Oil supply is outpacing demand growth. Inventories have been building since the beginning of the year.”
In the US, stockpiles of oil climbed by almost 12 million barrels in April according to the May 7 EIA monthly report on inventory, up by nearly 33 million barrels since January. At the same time, MasterCard's May 7 US gasoline report showed that gas demand has fallen by 5.8%. And refiners are reducing their refining rates dramatically to adjust to the falling gasoline demand. They are now running at 85% of capacity, down from 89% a year ago, in a season when production is normally 95%.
The May 8 report from Oil Movements, a British company that tracks oil shipments worldwide, shows that oil in transit on the high seas is also quite strong. Almost every category of shipment is running higher than it was a year ago. The report notes that, "In the West, a big share of any oil stock building done this year has happened offshore, out of sight." Some industry insiders say the global oil industry from the activities and stocks of the Big Four to the true state of tanker and storage and liftings, is the most secretive industry in the world with the possible exception of the narcotics trade.
Through a convenient regulation exception granted by the Bush Administration in January 2006, the ICE Futures trading of US energy futures is not regulated by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, even though the ICE Futures US oil contracts are traded in ICE affiliates in the USA.
Jun 29, 2008 | 6:35 AM
Category:
News
As you read the following, remember this:
In January 2006, per the Energy Information Administration (eia.doe.gov), the average of the weekly reports on gas prices was $2.32
FROM:http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm
/20911/sec_id/20911
The Oil bubble is largely the product of uncontrolled speculation by hedge funds, US pension funds and oil patch principals like T. Boone Pickens in the oil commodity futures and derivative markets. It has been fostered by two exemptions granted by the chief regulator of the US commodity markets, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission created by the Commodity Exchange Act of 1974 (CEA). The first exemption was, ironically, that granted to Enron in 2000 that enabled Over The Counter (OTC) energy derivatives trading. The second occurred in 2006 when, according to Business Week, the CFTC allowed ”unlimited speculation through a swaps loophole that exempted Wall Street investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch from reporting requirements and limits on trading positions that are required of other investors to the oil derivative traders on Wall Street vis a vis the ‘swaps’ exemption.” According to the Treasury Department, the top five Investment banks who dominate swap dealing in oil futures include: Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC America Holdings and Wachovia.
Witness this comment from the Engdahl report about how trading on the London-based ICE compounded the Enron loophole:
In January 2006, the Bush Administration’s CFTC permitted the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the leading operator of electronic energy exchanges, to use its trading terminals in the United States for the trading of US crude oil futures on the ICE futures exchange in London – called “ICE Futures.”
Persons within the United States seeking to trade key US energy commodities – US crude oil, gasoline, and heating oil futures – are able to avoid all US market oversight or reporting requirements by routing their trades through the ICE Futures exchange in London instead of the NYMEX in New York.
Is that not elegant? The US Government energy futures regulator, CFTC opened the way to the present unregulated and highly opaque oil futures speculation. It may just be coincidence that the present CEO of NYMEX, James Newsome, who also sits on the Dubai Exchange, is a former chairman of the US CFTC. In Washington doors revolve quite smoothly between private and public posts.
In January 2006 when the CFTC allowed the ICE Futures the gaping exception, oil prices were trading in the range of $59-60 a barrel. Today some two years later we see prices tapping $120 and trend upwards
FROM:http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&ai
d=9042
The chief market strategist for one of the world’s leading oil industry banks, David Kelly, of J.P. Morgan Funds, recently admitted something telling to the Washington Post, “One of the things I think is very important to realize is that the growth in the world oil consumption is not that strong."
Just a few days earlier, Lehman Brothers, a Wall Street investment bank had said that the current oil price bubble was coming to an end. Michael Waldron, the bank's chief oil strategist, was quoted in Britain's Daily Telegraph on Apr. 24 saying, "Oil supply is outpacing demand growth. Inventories have been building since the beginning of the year.”
In the US, stockpiles of oil climbed by almost 12 million barrels in April according to the May 7 EIA monthly report on inventory, up by nearly 33 million barrels since January. At the same time, MasterCard's May 7 US gasoline report showed that gas demand has fallen by 5.8%. And refiners are reducing their refining rates dramatically to adjust to the falling gasoline demand. They are now running at 85% of capacity, down from 89% a year ago, in a season when production is normally 95%.
The May 8 report from Oil Movements, a British company that tracks oil shipments worldwide, shows that oil in transit on the high seas is also quite strong. Almost every category of shipment is running higher than it was a year ago. The report notes that, "In the West, a big share of any oil stock building done this year has happened offshore, out of sight." Some industry insiders say the global oil industry from the activities and stocks of the Big Four to the true state of tanker and storage and liftings, is the most secretive industry in the world with the possible exception of the narcotics trade.
Through a convenient regulation exception granted by the Bush Administration in January 2006, the ICE Futures trading of US energy futures is not regulated by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, even though the ICE Futures US oil contracts are traded in ICE affiliates in the USA.
Jun 26, 2008 | 8:14 AM
Category:
News
Health Savings Accounts (HSA) are a product that offers consumers a way to save on their health care costs. If you meet the qualifications and open a HSA, you receive a deduction on your income tax return which lowers your taxable income. In effect, the monies you then use from your HSA to pay medical expenses is tax free income, the same as employee health insurance deductions taken out of a pay check before tax.
One of the qualifications for opening an HSA is that your health insurance policy qualifies as a “high-deductible” policy - the deductible for 2007 must be at least $1,100 for individual coverage or $2,200 for families.
Presidents and their families are entitled to free government health care. Not only do they not have a “high-deductible” policy, they have a no deductible policy - as in FREE.
Yet on the tax returns on George & Laura Bush for 2007 & 2005, they claimed a deduction for an HSA. http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/President
ialTaxReturns
Since we all know our President obviously wouldn’t cheat on his taxes, I was wondering if anyone knew how the average taxpayer could legally claim this tax deduction & also lower their taxable income while not having to pay this “high-deductible amount” out of their pockets?
Jun 26, 2008 | 8:11 AM
Category:
News
Health Savings Accounts (HSA) are a product that offers consumers a way to save on their health care costs. If you meet the qualifications and open a HSA, you receive a deduction on your income tax return which lowers your taxable income. In effect, the monies you then use from your HSA to pay medical expenses is tax free income, the same as employee health insurance deductions taken out of a pay check before tax.
One of the qualifications for opening an HSA is that your health insurance policy qualifies as a “high-deductible” policy - the deductible for 2007 must be at least $1,100 for individual coverage or $2,200 for families.
Presidents and their families are entitled to free government health care. Not only do they not have a “high-deductible” policy, they have a no deductible policy - as in FREE.
Yet on the tax returns on George & Laura Bush for 2007 & 2005, they claimed a deduction for an HSA. http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/President
ialTaxReturns
Since we all know our President obviously wouldn’t cheat on his taxes, I was wondering if anyone knew how the average taxpayer could legally claim this tax deduction & also lower their taxable income while not having to pay this “high-deductible amount” out of their pockets?
Jun 25, 2008 | 8:04 AM
Category:
News
Analysts predict vehicle repossessions this year will rise as much as 15 percent to about 1.6-million cases nationwide. That's on top of a 10 percent increase last year — yet another sign of the growing economic stress on consumers.
And Florida is one of the states where the trend is most obvious. Although the state doesn't track the number of vehicle repossessions, the number of people applying for licenses to either become a recovery agent or to start a recovery business has risen dramatically. Florida now has 390 interns seeking to become "recovery agents," the most the state has ever had.
FULL ARTICLE @ http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/workinglife/artic
le636031.ece
The increase in car repossessions is putting some repo companies and car auctioneers in a bind about where to park them all….
Florida locksmith Amy Palmer, who makes new keys for repossessed vehicles, told USA Today that business is "phenomenal." She added, "If you're not paying for your house, who is paying for the car?"
Full Article @ http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/smartspending/archive
/2008/02/21/subprime-fallout-vehicle-repossessions-on-t
he-rise.aspx
"Look at what’s going on. Food prices are up. Job creation has slowed. People are losing their jobs. And gas is up. It’s all these factors combined," said Carol Kaplan, the bankers association’s spokeswoman.
Last year’s 1.51 million repossessions marked one of the biggest increases in a decade, 10 percent, and the growth is projected to continue this year, to 1.6 million, said economist Tom Webb of wholesale car auctioneer Manheim Consulting.
FULL ARTICLE @ http://www.columbiatribune.com/2008/Jun/20080613Busi015
.asp
It is also an increasingly common story as more Americans, under growing economic pressure, are deciding to surrender their rides rather than the roofs over their heads
Lenders, meanwhile, are writing off billions of dollars in defaulted loans, and some analysts worry this could escalate to a foreclosure crisis on wheels.
FULL ARTICLE @ http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles
/2008/03/07/entering_the_repossession_lane/?page=2
Jun 25, 2008 | 7:48 AM
Category:
News
Analysts predict vehicle repossessions this year will rise as much as 15 percent to about 1.6-million cases nationwide. That's on top of a 10 percent increase last year — yet another sign of the growing economic stress on consumers.
And Florida is one of the states where the trend is most obvious. Although the state doesn't track the number of vehicle repossessions, the number of people applying for licenses to either become a recovery agent or to start a recovery business has risen dramatically. Florida now has 390 interns seeking to become "recovery agents," the most the state has ever had.
FULL ARTICLE @ http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/workinglife/artic
le636031.ece
The increase in car repossessions is putting some repo companies and car auctioneers in a bind about where to park them all….
Florida locksmith Amy Palmer, who makes new keys for repossessed vehicles, told USA Today that business is "phenomenal." She added, "If you're not paying for your house, who is paying for the car?"
Full Article @ http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/smartspending/archive
/2008/02/21/subprime-fallout-vehicle-repossessions-on-t
he-rise.aspx
"Look at what’s going on. Food prices are up. Job creation has slowed. People are losing their jobs. And gas is up. It’s all these factors combined," said Carol Kaplan, the bankers association’s spokeswoman.
Last year’s 1.51 million repossessions marked one of the biggest increases in a decade, 10 percent, and the growth is projected to continue this year, to 1.6 million, said economist Tom Webb of wholesale car auctioneer Manheim Consulting.
FULL ARTICLE @ http://www.columbiatribune.com/2008/Jun/20080613Busi015
.asp
It is also an increasingly common story as more Americans, under growing economic pressure, are deciding to surrender their rides rather than the roofs over their heads
Lenders, meanwhile, are writing off billions of dollars in defaulted loans, and some analysts worry this could escalate to a foreclosure crisis on wheels.
FULL ARTICLE @ http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles
/2008/03/07/entering_the_repossession_lane/?page=2