FloydFreak's Blog

PS: I'm a "Registered Republican" as well as a Ron Paul supporter, so I doubt your original post was meant for me, but I thought I would just offer my services to you as you seem to be crying out for help in your post and it appears you are frustrated from not understanding what is really going on.

Although it is against "policy", I am going to let Boy Wonder's comments stand.

Hey Bud, read your comments. You didn't ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTION. True to the modus operandi that you have demonstrated since your Can't_Get_Laid_Back_Farmer days, you have been backed into a logical corner and turned it into yet ANOTHER personal attach on me. So, come on, educate me.

Gee, am I supposed to be impressed? You're a "registered Republican"? I'm not. But whatever. John McCain is, too.

dangela4 also gets it about Dr. Paul. I'd vote for him in a minute over McCain if I did NOT believe that doing so would hand the White House to Clinton. Look at what voting for Perot did to America in 1992.

Quote by dangela4: "But F.T.P you really come across as a real A-hole."

Thank you, dangela4! BTW: I like your avatar. I miss the old Bucs uniforms/logos.

...I don't suppose this blog was addressed to me, but I think I can interject with some logic regardless. So what you're asking is how Bush and Cheney pulled off some war profiteering, under the guise of an energy crisis?

...You do know that Haliburton, good ol' Cheney's buddies, are the biggest contractors over there don't ya, do you not think it might be due to Bush and Cheney's influence that they got those contracts? hmmm...

...And there is much debate about "peak oil" being a myth. Heck, it's a well known fact that Alaska has huge oil reserves. Yet, it seems oil is a secondary reason for occupation, as opposed to the issue of destabilizing the region for the purpose of blocking the entire area into an EU, or a NAU type super-state, which is an essential step toward globalization.

...I don't get where the protective stance of Bush comes from, he's thrown us into an unconstitutional, undeclared war and put us in extreme economic danger. He's taken steps to take away our rights, and set up dictator-style policies through his abuse of executive orders which could be implemented on his whim by declaring a national emergency. And that's not even the half of it. So what's the deal, why do you stand in defense of someone who's done such harmful deeds?

chAng - it’s called brainwashing.

I’ve already replied to the screen name FF regarding this in another thread. Yet this screen name instead starts an ass-ociate thread (sound familiar?)

As far as a whack job - it's a pity that anyone can't figure out what obviously would happen in a prolonged iraq war to oil prices. Simply look at the spike in 1990.

Listen as the audience laughs at FF’s hero:
http://politicalhumor.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?
zi=1/XJ&sdn=politicalhumor&cdn=entertainment&tm=4&gps=8
5_134_1089_823&f=01&su=p284.8.150.ip_&tt=9&bt=0&bts=0&z
u=http%3A//youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DB5xVRXLgLxw

"Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a — you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2004

If you "see" a pattern, it's time for an eye check up.

I've replied to you regarding this in another thread. If you can't understand it there, what makes you think you can understand it here?

You also conveniently ignored what I said about the 1990 oil price spike above.

Stop dodging the answers.

As I said, you still can't understand the other thread. But thanks for another laugh.

WOW! How many times are you going to change your last post?

Why did you delete your post:
Feb 2, 2008 | 7:08 AM
This is quite good fun, isn't it???

As for earlier spikes, good try but it doesn't change:
"it's a pity that anyone can't figure out what obviously would happen in a prolonged iraq war to oil prices. Simply look at the spike in 1990."

...The rise in oil prices is a reflection of the value of the US dollar. It's probably the best way to gauge inflation.

...You say terrorists are the only ones in threat of loosing their rights, but with the broadening definition of terrorism, anyone could technically be considered a terrorist, especially if HR 1955 gets passed, and you don't even have to be proven to be a terrorist, just the accusation could get you put away indefinitely.

...It's definitely something to think about before being so quick to declare the stance you've chosen.

OK, DEOPiate. This is for you:

"This is quite good fun, isn't it???"

Happy now???

To coin a term used by Mel Brooks, "It's good to be the king!"

P.S.: Notice how I haven't deleted YOUR comments?

...The more the dollar is devalued, the more dollars it takes to buy the same amount of goods. Not only for oil, but everything.

...Haven't you noticed price increases across the board in all our goods and services? The price of milk is another good way to judge inflation, Little Debbie snack cakes even raised their prices for the first time in who knows how many decades.

...You're putting the cart before the horse. The fundamentals of it are very simple. Supply and demand is right, and also, these major oil exporting countries are going through inflation themselves, which adds to the debacle.

...It boils down to our government overspending on this war with no end in sight. Ron Paul is an economist and his stance on foreign policy is deeply rooted with saving our dollar. Also, backing our fiat money with something tangible would have an overwhelming, immediate effect.

...Otherwise our dollar will tank, and we'll all be using the Amero paperless currency, via RFID chips, which is probably the Bush's plan, or should I say, the elitist globalists plan, being implemented by their boy, Bush.

...It's probably in the top secret executive orders he won't even let the homeland security members of congress see.