Several states are considering lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18. In doing so, they risk losing millions of dollars in federal highway funding. But, beyond that, such attempts are sure to spark a furious debate. When I was 18, 21 was the legal drinking in most states. By the time I reached my 21st birthday, it had been lowered to 18. The argument goes that, if someone is old enough to serve in the military and put his or her life on the line, they should be able to order a beer. Strong argument.
Organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving would argue strenuously that allowing 18-year olds to drink legally would lead to a surge in teenage traffic deaths. Very strong argument!
Here's the problem. Whether the "legal" age is 21 or 18, kids are drinking. In fact, it seems to be a rite of passage on most college, if not high school campuses. It's very difficult to legislate human behavior.
So, to my way of thinking, the tone has to be set by parents. You can forbid your under 21-year old from drinking entirely. Yet, to me, the rigid approach rarely works and frequently backfires. The more reasonable strategy might be to insist on responsible drinking. That means, under no circumstances, should your son or daughter get behind the wheel after drinking alcohol. As we've seen too many times, the potential consequences are both life altering and life threatening.
| Member Comments | Total Comments: 11 |
|
|
FloydFreak
Apr 3, 2008 | 4:36 PM |
|||||
|
MoonOwl
Apr 4, 2008 | 6:17 AM |
|||||
|
leasheryn
Apr 4, 2008 | 7:00 PM |
|||||
|
mmustangg
Apr 4, 2008 | 9:51 PM |
|||||
|
MoonOwl
Apr 5, 2008 | 6:42 AM |
|||||
|
MoonOwl
Apr 5, 2008 | 6:44 AM |
|||||
|
mmustangg
Apr 5, 2008 | 7:50 AM |
|||||
|
MoonOwl
Apr 5, 2008 | 8:14 AM |
|||||
|
Neckcarjim
Apr 5, 2008 | 5:28 PM |
|||||
|
Loveit
Apr 6, 2008 | 6:35 PM |
|||||
|
JANICELPED
Apr 7, 2008 | 8:23 AM |
|||||
|
|||||