MyFox
 

HEAFFA2DA's Blog

by HEAFFA2DA from FLORIDA

Last Post 62 days, 16 hours Ago


This post has been edited by an administrator

The first 2 entries are:http://youtube.com/watch?v=Q80ufVT0RGw&feature
=related
            http://www.youtube.com/watch
?v=vqmy5qrvaVQ&feature=related
 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Comment | Add a Comment

The GWB Presidential Library  
The George W Bush Presidential Library is now in the planning stages.   The Library will include:   The Karl Rove Room - to gain admittance you must read & repeat the sign on the door 100 times which reads “Welcome to our fabulous swimming pool filled with refreshingly cool sparkling clean water.” The room actually has a 12’ deep hole filled with bull manure. Middle class Republicans (and those who just think they are above middle class) enjoy this room over & over. The belly flop is the favorite dive in this room.   The Rush Limbaugh Room - same inside as the Karl Rove Room. However, oil is sold at the door for $125 per barrel, & you must enter the “pool” nude & butt first.   The “Tax Cut” Restaurant - serving daily:
 A) For those in the top 5% income = FREE filet mignon, caviar, & champagne
 B) for everyone else = FREE peanuts & water, so they can say they are giving  something to everyone. However, the “everyone else” group will be charged a
 fee as they exit. The museum wants to be clear that this is not a charge for     the peanuts & water, & certainly is not a “tax”!   The Hurricane Katrina Room, which is still under construction, but reportedly doing a “great job“.   The Alberto Gonzales Room, where you can’t remember anything   The Texas Air National Guard Room, where you don’t have to even show up as long as daddy has some pull.   The Walter Reed Hospital Room, where they don’t let you in.   The Guantanamo Bay Room, where they don’t let you out.   The Weapons of Mass Destruction Room (which no one has been able to find).   The National Debt room which is huge and has no ceiling.
 
The Economy Room - wall to wall toilets.   The Iraq War Room. After you complete your first tour, they make you go back for a second, third, fourth, and sometimes fifth tour.   The Dick Cheney Room, in an undisclosed location, complete with shooting gallery. Upon entering, you will receive an “I’m a Big Dick” button.   The Environmental Conservation Room which is empty.   The “Drug Plan” room which they’re still trying to figure out.   The “Welcome Scientists” room - the door has been barricaded & welded shut.   The Immigration Reform Room complete with undocumented attendants.   The “Thanks Jeb” Room - with memorabilia of the 2000 election.   The “Thanks Ohio” Room - with memorabilia of the 2004 election.   The Oil Baron’s Lounge - with continuous updates on the price of a barrel of oil, & the price of a gallon of gas.   The Airport Men’s Room, where you can meet some of your favorite Republican Senators.    The “Decider Room” complete with dart board, magic 8-ball, Ouija board, dice, coins, and straws.   The “Twilight Zone” Movie Theatre - Featuring a remake of the fantasy film “The Rescue of Private Lynch” A highlight of the film will show GWB running through a hail of bullets, with bombs falling within a few feet. While running he spots a VHS tape in perfect condition in the middle of a bombed out totally destroyed building. When this tape is played, it shows a grainy image of someone claiming to be from his friend’s family, the bin Ladens. This individual claims that he has kidnapped Private Lynch and that he is treating her the same way Bush treats Americans, but he is being kind enough to use vaseline. GWB wipes a tear from his eye while crying out “I will find that evil doer”. Oh yeah, there is something on the tape about a claim to be behind 09/11 too. The thrilling end will show GWB  with sword in hand leading Cheney, Rove, & others up a hill to rescue the fair maiden, who of course is in a princess dress. The camera then zooms to another hill where sheep are positioned to spell out “Mission Accomplished”.       To highlight the President’s accomplishments, the museum will have
electron microscopes (available for a “donation”) to help in your attempt to locate one.  
When asked, President Bush said that he didn’t care so much about the individual exhibits as long as his museum was better than his father’s.  
Admission:   Independents - will be given a check for $600 to “stimulate” their thinking. They must sign a waiver that they will vote by absentee ballots & send the ballots to a Crawford, Texas address.   Republicans - free   Democrats - $1000,  3 Euros, or the cost of a tank of gas - whichever is currently higher. They will also be sent a bill to pay for the Independents stimulation checks.
3 Comments | Add a Comment

Thank goodness. Now that the best female singer is gone just like the best male singer the week before, my wife finally agrees that it's ridiculous to waste time watching this show anymore. Thank you voters! We now can save energy by not having 2 TV's on when this waste of a TV show was being shown.
5 Comments | Add a Comment

BAGHDAD —  Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice mocked anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr as a coward on Sunday, hours after the radical leader threatened to declare war unless U.S. and Iraqi forces end a military crackdown on his followers.

Rice, in the Iraqi capital to tout security gains and what she calls an emerging political consensus, said al-Sadr is content to issue threats and edicts from the safety of Iran, where he is studying. Al-Sadr heads an unruly militia that was the main target of an Iraqi government assault in the oil-rich city of Basra last month, and his future role as a spoiler is an open question.

"I know he's sitting in Iran," Rice said dismissively, when asked about al-Sadr's latest threat to lift a self-imposed cease-fire with government and U.S. forces. "I guess it's all-out war for anybody but him," Rice said. "I guess that's the message; his followers can go too their deaths and he's in Iran."

A full-blown uprising by al-Sadr, who led two rebellions against U.S.-led forces in 2004, could lead to a dramatic increase in violence in Iraq at a time when the Sunni extremist group Al Qaeda in Iraq appears poised for new attacks after suffering severe blows last year

In a warning posted Saturday on his Web site, al-Sadr said he had tried to defuse tensions by declaring the truce last August, only to see the Shiite-led government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki respond by closing his offices and "resorting to assassinations."

http://www.foxnews.com/world/afghanistan/index.html>

 

Yep, what a chickenhawk. This clown claims he wants peace, but the coward sits in another country while he sends his soldiers to their deaths.

Of course, maybe Rice's words wouldn't be pure hypocrisy and would actually mean something if she included all the chickenhawks in her statement. 

 

 

 

 

 

Add a Comment

While we are told the crime rate is down - Tuesday morning 3 pieces of garbage with guns invaded a CVS pharmacy and stole money & drugs. Also Tuesday morning, a lone sack of crap with a hand gun held up a RaceTrac. Monday a group of young punks attacked and beat a 52 year old man riding a scooter. Sunday afternoon, a 79 year old man was beaten & carjacked in an Albertson's parking lot.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

Our justice system simply is not working. Why? Because the scum I noted above aren't worried about being caught. What happens if they are caught? Maybe a few weeks to a few years of having a clean bed to sleep in, being served 3 meals a day, & no worries about mortgage , auto, or child support payments. For the average person the loss of freedom would be terrible, for these scumbags it's a lifestyle improvement courtesy of the taxpayers.

Maybe "an eye for an eye" justice would get the scumbags attention. All of the scum noted above used their hands in their crimes. I would be much more happy to see my tax dollars going toward hand amputations then being spent giving them room & board. Besides saving taxpayers money there, this scum would not be eligible for any government assistance for the rest of their lives - nothing - no unemployment, no medicaid, no food stamps, no housing allowances, no welfare. And no Social Security, not disability or retirement - they would forfeit any monies put into Social Security to pay back the cost of their amputation(s). But my tax money could be used to supply them with airfare and a parachute to drop them off over Siberia.

Drastic - you bet. But maybe if they realize that a hand (or something else) could be chopped off & they would have to search dumpsters with their feet to get something to eat, it might just get their attention.

23 Comments | Add a Comment

According to today's government report - "Over the past 12 months, inflation is up by 4 percent"

Reminds me of a quote by that famous scholar GWB:

"There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —President George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 (Listen to audio or watch video)

14 Comments | Add a Comment

Miss Cranapple (who teaches 1st grade in rural North Florida) asked her students if there were any current events they would like to discuss.

Tiny Richard Jr. raised his hand & said "ma daddy sayis that thore can'tnt be no such theeng as global warmings." Miss Cranapple asked tiny Richard Jr. how his daddy knew that. "He sayis that it are cold out thore today, so his buddies sayis hows can anysone sayis it's a warming." replied tiny Richard Jr.

Miss Cranapple quickly turned towards the chalk board so tiny Richard Jr. wouldn't see her laughing. She knew tiny Richard Jr's daddy, big Richard,  fell out onto the KMart floor during his birth & never made it past the 1st grade, even though he brought an apple to school every day for the teacher. When she composed herself, she told tiny Richard Jr that it's more complicated than that simple approach. She added "Tiny Richard Jr, one day you will realize how important the combination of a good education and a strong mind is. That way you will be able to think for yourself rather than believing anything you hear just because it sounds right to you."

15 Comments | Add a Comment

What happens when someone who knows nothing about a particular subject tries to write a blog about that particular subject? You get an hilariously funny blog filled with incorrect claims.

Booggymann certainly showed his lack of knowledge concerning income taxes. He listed a link: www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html knowing that some will blindly believe that his following calculations are shown on that web site. What the link actually brings you to is a report titled “Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History“ from 1913-2008. It shows all the tax brackets for each year, but it does not, for example, say how much tax a single taxpayer making 30K actually paid any year. Thank goodness for that, otherwise Booggymann might have been able to even fool some who have any knowledge at all of income taxes. Thank goodness also, because here is where the laughs really take off.

Here is Booggymann’s claims:

Taxes under Clinton 1999   Taxes under Bush 2008

Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - tax $12,500
Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250

ALL OF THESE AMOUNTS ARE INCORRECT!

Let’s examine one of Booggymann’s claims - that in 1999, a single taxpayer making 30K paid income taxes of $8,400. Booggymann looked at the 1999 tax brackets showing that 30K for a single taxpayer was in the 28% bracket. So he multiplied $30,000 times 28%, and claimed $8,400 of taxes was paid. FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!

First, Booggymann doesn’t even know that tax brackets are based on taxable income, not what someone makes. In 1999, the single standard deduction was $4,300 & 1 personal exemption was $2,750. So this single taxpayer making 30K had taxable income of $22,950.

So this single taxpayer who made 30K in 1999 was actually taxed on $22,950 (or less if he itemized deductions) which was taxed @ 15%.

Therefore his tax was $3,446, not $8,400 as Booggymann claimed.

Secondly, Booggymann thinks that if your total income figure is within a higher tax bracket, then all your income is taxed at that rate. MORE FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!

The reality though is that even if you make a $million, your taxable income is taxed progressively up the brackets.

Take Booggymann’s claim that a single taxpayer making 50K paid $14,000 in taxes in 1999. Booggymann took this whole $50,000 & multiplied it times 28%

This taxpayer actually had taxable income of $42,950 (even less if he itemized). Even though this $42,950 falls in the 28% bracket, the first $25,750 was taxed at 15%. His income tax was $8,686, not $14,000 as Booggymann claimed.

ALL of his numbers in his blog are not even close to reality. Booggymann claims the single taxpayer making 30K is paying $3,900 per year less than in 1999 ($4,500 in 2008 compared to $8,400 in 1999), as I said - NOT EVEN CLOSE.

Are the numbers for the same income less in 2008, than in 1999? YES. For example, the single taxpayer making $30,000 paid $690 less in 2008 than in 1999. If you think this taxpayer isn’t paying it back in increased local or state taxes, then you likely agree with Booggymann’s numbers too. For example, when U.S. Treasury revenue declined due to the tax cuts, less federal money was sent to the states. One of Jeb Bush’s solutions was to reduce the percentage of local school taxes that the state paid. You now make that up by paying a greater percentage of local school taxes. In other words your property taxes increased to help offset your income tax cut. The politicians want you to disregard everything else, & just see what happened on your 1040. Sadly, some are fooled this way.

Booggymann then goes on:

“Both democratic candidates will return to the higher tax rates” &

“If Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen.”

Now either Booggymann just blindly believes any propaganda that sounds good to him, or he is simply mistaken, or he’s an outright liar. Neither of the Democratic candidates are saying they will repeal the tax cuts “of the people that fall into the categories above” (Booggymann specifically stated income of $125,000 or less).

Clinton’s plan for income taxes is to “Increase on income over $250,000. Make the current (Bush tax cut) rates for "middle class" families permanent.” Also “Would create a matching refundable tax credit for contributions made to 401(k)s.”

Obama’s plan is “"Repeal Bush's tax cuts for top 1%. Eliminate income taxes on seniors earning $50,000 per year or less.”

So the reality is “the people that fall into the categories above” would do better under Clinton’s or Obama’s plans, not worse as the scare tactic propaganda claims.

BTW - Clinton’s & Obama’s plans are also on the Tax Foundation’s web site @ http://www.taxfoundation.org/candidates08/comp
are/
Guess Booggymann just happened to miss that page.

 

This hilarious blog I’m referring to is “Comparing apples to Apples” written by Booggymann on 04/07/08. Booggymann started by proclaiming “Taxes…Whether Democrat or a Republican you will find these statistics enlightening and amazing.” As you saw, Booggymann’s whole blog is certainly amazing, to say the least.
13 Comments | Add a Comment

What happens when someone who knows nothing about a particular subject tries to write a blog about that particular subject? You get an hilariously funny blog filled with incorrect claims.

Booggymann certainly showed his lack of knowledge concerning income taxes. He listed a link: www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html knowing that some will blindly believe that his following calculations are shown on that web site. What the link actually brings you to is a report titled “Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History“ from 1913-2008. It shows all the tax brackets for each year, but it does not, for example, say how much tax a single taxpayer making 30K actually paid any year. Thank goodness for that, otherwise Booggymann might have been able to even fool some who have any knowledge at all of income taxes. Thank goodness also, because here is where the laughs really take off.

Here is Booggymann’s claims:

Taxes under Clinton 1999

Taxes under Bush 2008

Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - tax $12,500
Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250

ALL OF THESE AMOUNTS ARE INCORRECT!

Let’s examine one of Booggymann’s claims - that in 1999, a single taxpayer making 30K paid income taxes of $8,400. Booggymann looked at the 1999 tax brackets showing that 30K for a single taxpayer was in the 28% bracket. So he multiplied $30,000 times 28%, and claimed $8,400 of taxes was paid. FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!

First, Booggymann doesn’t even know that tax brackets are based on taxable income, not what someone makes. In 1999, the single standard deduction was $4,300 & 1 personal exemption was $2,750. So this single taxpayer making 30K had taxable income of $22,950.

So this single taxpayer who made 30K in 1999 was actually taxed on $22,950 (or less if he itemized deductions) which was taxed @ 15%.

Therefore his tax was $3,446, not $8,400 as Booggymann claimed.

Secondly, Booggymann thinks that if your total income figure is within a higher tax bracket, then all your income is taxed at that rate. MORE FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!

The reality though is that even if you make a $million, your taxable income is taxed progressively up the brackets.

Take Booggymann’s claim that a single taxpayer making 50K paid $14,000 in taxes in 1999. Booggymann took this whole $50,000 & multiplied it times 28%

This taxpayer actually had taxable income of $42,950 (even less if he itemized). Even though this $42,950 falls in the 28% bracket, the first $25,750 was taxed at 15%. His income tax was $8,686, not $14,000 as Booggymann claimed.

ALL of his numbers in his blog are not even close to reality. Booggymann claims the single taxpayer making 30K is paying $3,900 per year less than in 1999 ($4,500 in 2008 compared to $8,400 in 1999), as I said - NOT EVEN CLOSE.

Are the numbers for the same income less in 2008, than in 1999? YES. For example, the single taxpayer making $30,000 paid $690 less in 2008 than in 1999. If you think this taxpayer isn’t paying it back in increased local or state taxes, then you likely agree with Booggymann’s numbers too. For example, when U.S. Treasury revenue declined due to the tax cuts, less federal money was sent to the states. One of Jeb Bush’s solutions was to reduce the percentage of local school taxes that the state paid. You now make that up by paying a greater percentage of local school taxes. In other words your property taxes increased to help offset your income tax cut. The politicians want you to disregard everything else, & just see what happened on your 1040. Sadly, some are fooled this way.

Booggymann then goes on:

“Both democratic candidates will return to the higher tax rates” &

“If Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen.”

Now either Booggymann just blindly believes any propaganda that sounds good to him, or he is simply mistaken, or he’s an outright liar. Neither of the Democratic candidates are saying they will repeal the tax cuts “of the people that fall into the categories above” (Booggymann specifically stated income of $125,000 or less).

Clinton’s plan for income taxes is to “Increase on income over $250,000. Make the current (Bush tax cut) rates for "middle class" families permanent.” Also “Would create a matching refundable tax credit for contributions made to 401(k)s.”

Obama’s plan is “"Repeal Bush's tax cuts for top 1%. Eliminate income taxes on seniors earning $50,000 per year or less.”

So the reality is “the people that fall into the categories above” would do better under Clinton’s or Obama’s plans, not worse as the scare tactic propaganda claims.

BTW - Clinton’s & Obama’s plans are also on the Tax Foundation’s web site @ http://www.taxfoundation.org/candidates08/comp
are/
Guess Booggymann just happened to miss that page.

 

This hilarious blog I’m referring to is “Comparing apples to Apples” written by Booggymann on 04/07/08. Booggymann started by proclaiming “Taxes…Whether Democrat or a Republican you will find these statistics enlightening and amazing.” As you saw, Booggymann’s whole blog is certainly amazing, to say the least.
5 Comments | Add a Comment

What happens when someone who knows nothing about a particular subject tries to write a blog about that particular subject? You get an hilariously funny blog filled with incorrect claims.

Booggymann certainly showed his lack of knowledge concerning income taxes. He listed a link: www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html knowing that some will blindly believe that his following calculations are shown on that web site. What the link actually brings you to is a report titled “Federal Individual Income Tax Rates History“ from 1913-2008. It shows all the tax brackets for each year, but it does not, for example, say how much tax a single taxpayer making 30K actually paid any year. Thank goodness for that, otherwise Booggymann might have been able to even fool some who have any knowledge at all of income taxes. Thank goodness also, because here is where the laughs really take off.

Here is Booggymann’s claims:

Taxes under Clinton 1999

Taxes under Bush 2008

Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - tax $12,500
Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250

ALL OF THESE AMOUNTS ARE INCORRECT!

Let’s examine one of Booggymann’s claims - that in 1999, a single taxpayer making 30K paid income taxes of $8,400. Booggymann looked at the 1999 tax brackets showing that 30K for a single taxpayer was in the 28% bracket. So he multiplied $30,000 times 28%, and claimed $8,400 of taxes was paid. FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!

First, Booggymann doesn’t even know that tax brackets are based on taxable income, not what someone makes. In 1999, the single standard deduction was $4,300 & 1 personal exemption was $2,750. So this single taxpayer making 30K had taxable income of $22,950.

So this single taxpayer who made 30K in 1999 was actually taxed on $22,950 (or less if he itemized deductions) which was taxed @ 15%.

Therefore his tax was $3,446, not $8,400 as Booggymann claimed.

Secondly, Booggymann thinks that if your total income figure is within a higher tax bracket, then all your income is taxed at that rate. MORE FUNNY, FUNNY STUFF!

The reality though is that even if you make a $million, your taxable income is taxed progressively up the brackets.

Take Booggymann’s claim that a single taxpayer making 50K paid $14,000 in taxes in 1999. Booggymann took this whole $50,000 & multiplied it times 28%

This taxpayer actually had taxable income of $42,950 (even less if he itemized). Even though this $42,950 falls in the 28% bracket, the first $25,750 was taxed at 15%. His income tax was $8,686, not $14,000 as Booggymann claimed.

ALL of his numbers in his blog are not even close to reality. Booggymann claims the single taxpayer making 30K is paying $3,900 per year less than in 1999 ($4,500 in 2008 compared to $8,400 in 1999), as I said - NOT EVEN CLOSE.

Are the numbers for the same income less in 2008, than in 1999? YES. For example, the single taxpayer making $30,000 paid $690 less in 2008 than in 1999. If you think this taxpayer isn’t paying it back in increased local or state taxes, then you likely agree with Booggymann’s numbers too. For example, when U.S. Treasury revenue declined due to the tax cuts, less federal money was sent to the states. One of Jeb Bush’s solutions was to reduce the percentage of local school taxes that the state paid. You now make that up by paying a greater percentage of local school taxes. In other words your property taxes increased to help offset your income tax cut. The politicians want you to disregard everything else, & just see what happened on your 1040. Sadly, some are fooled this way.

Booggymann then goes on:

“Both democratic candidates will return to the higher tax rates” &

“If Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen.”

Now either Booggymann just blindly believes any propaganda that sounds good to him, or he is simply mistaken, or he’s an outright liar. Neither of the Democratic candidates are saying they will repeal the tax cuts “of the people that fall into the categories above” (Booggymann specifically stated income of $125,000 or less).

Clinton’s plan for income taxes is to “Increase on income over $250,000. Make the current (Bush tax cut) rates for "middle class" families permanent.” Also “Would create a matching refundable tax credit for contributions made to 401(k)s.”

Obama’s plan is “"Repeal Bush's tax cuts for top 1%. Eliminate income taxes on seniors earning $50,000 per year or less.”

So the reality is “the people that fall into the categories above” would do better under Clinton’s or Obama’s plans, not worse as the scare tactic propaganda claims.

BTW - Clinton’s & Obama’s plans are also on the Tax Foundation’s web site @ http://www.taxfoundation.org/candidates08/comp
are/
Guess Booggymann just happened to miss that page.

 

This hilarious blog I’m referring to is “Comparing apples to Apples” written by Booggymann on 04/07/08. Booggymann started by proclaiming “Taxes…Whether Democrat or a Republican you will find these statistics enlightening and amazing.” As you saw, Booggymann’s whole blog is certainly amazing, to say the least.
11 Comments | Add a Comment

MSNBC Live

hosts Mika Brzezinski and Contessa Brewer each described as a "top meteorologist" William M. Gray, who has stated that global warming "is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people." Both also noted Gray's claim that rising temperatures "are simply part of a natural cycle," but neither noted that the overwhelming majority of scientists disagree with that assertion and have concluded that global climate change is caused by human activity.

During the 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. ET hours of MSNBC Live on October 15, hosts Mika Brzezinski and Contessa Brewer, respectively, described as a "top meteorologist" William M. Gray, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Colorado State University, who has stated that global warming "is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people." Both Brzezinski and Brewer then noted that Gray "is slamming [former Vice President] Al Gore" and quoted Gray's remarks at the University of North Carolina, where he reportedly said that "[w]e're brainwashing our children" with information about global warming. Both Brzezinski and Brewer noted Gray's claim that rising temperatures "are simply part of a natural cycle," but neither noted that the overwhelming majority of scientists disagree with Gray's claim and agree that global climate change is caused by human activity, as Media Matters for America has documented. The blog Think Progress also noted MSNBC's coverage of Gray's comments.

On April 26, 2006, RealClimate.org, which describes itself as "a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists," responded to a paper written by Gray by detailing "the fundamental misconceptions on the physics of climate that underlie most of Gray's pronouncements on climate change and its causes" and "the gaping flaws" in his "scientific argument." A June 11, 2006, article in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Judith A. Curry, chair of Georgia Tech's School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, said that "Gray's message that global warming is a hoax is being heard because of his media connections, but she [Curry] points out he has not published any research to back it up." The article quoted Curry saying: "His ideas on global warming are not taken seriously in scientific circles." Additionally, a May 28, 2006, Washington Post Magazine article by Joel Achenbach reported that Gray "concede[d] that he hasn't published the idea [his theory about recent warming trends] in any peer-reviewed journal." Achenbach also noted that Gray's rejection of climate models puts him "increasingly on the fringe" in the field of meteorology. When Achenbach "ask[ed] Gray who his intellectual soul mates are regarding global warming," Gray responded, "I have nobody really to talk to about this stuff.'" In the article, Gray was quoted as saying, "Gore believed in global warming almost as much as Hitler believed there was something wrong with the Jews."

Further, neither Brzezinski nor Brewer noted that United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change disagrees with Gray's claim that rising temperatures "are simply part of a natural cycle." Brewer aired Gray's comments before noting that "Gore shared the Nobel Peace Prize with the chairman of a U.N. panel made up of 2,000 scientists and experts." However, Brewer described the U.N. panel as simply "also studying the human race's effect on climate change" without noting the panel's recent conclusions that the evidence that the earth's climate is warming is "unequivocal" and that most of the observed warming is due to human influences.

http://mediamatters.org/items/printable/20071015000
9

4 Comments | Add a Comment

 

Ok, let’s be honest. One reason for this blog is to rattle the puny little minds of booggymann, floydfreak, mmustangg, and others like them. Go to it, children.

On the other hand -  for those that use their minds, here is more info for the debate on global warming.

 

Rising sea level already eating away at Florida's coastline

By Curtis Krueger and Craig Pittman, Times Staff Writers

Published Friday, March 28, 2008 3:33 PM

* FOLLOWING ARE PARTS OF THE ARTICLE

Global warming is boosting the sea level along Florida's gulf coast and already causing profound environmental changes, scientists say.

• At Waccasassa State Park in Levy County, palms trees are toppling over dead as rising saltwater creeps up the beach.

• At Rookery Bay Preserve near Naples, salt­water mangroves have invaded what used to be freshwater marshes.

• On the western side of Everglades National Park, inland marshes are being replaced by seawater ponds.

"People have a hard time accepting that this is happening here," said University of Florida professor Jack Putz, who has led a Levy County research effort since 1992. Seeing the dying palms, he said, "brings a global problem right into our own back yard."

What is happening is not just a minor botanical alteration in a few isolated places. The scientists studying the phenomenon see it as a harbinger for major changes in the state's geography — submerging islands and turning swamps into open bays. Those changes alone can create a serious economic impact on businesses such as fishing.

The rising sea generally has crept up so slowly that it has been barely noticeable. In the Tampa Bay area, for instance, "we've actually seen an increase of about an inch a decade" since measurements began in the 1940s, said Holly Greening, executive director of the Tampa Bay Estuary Program.

Now, the rate at which the sea level is rising appears to be picking up speed.

The sea level's rise is often difficult to detect along urban coastlines because seawalls and replenished beaches can obscure or blunt the impact, said Mike Savarese, a Florida Gulf Coast University marine science professor.

But the changes wrought by higher seas are more obvious in wilderness areas such as state and national parks. In those natural areas, "we're seeing some real indications of a change out there," Savarese said.

• • •

Rising global temperatures are melting mountaintop glaciers in Greenland and other cold locales, raising the world's sea level. But an even bigger factor is thermal expansion. Water, like most materials, expands as it gets warmer. So as the upper level of the ocean warms up, the water expands, pushing the sea level higher.

To study past sea level fluctuations, Savarese has been pulling out core samples from around the Ten Thousand Islands area of Everglades National Park. By using carbon dating, he can see how old the different layers are. It paints a clear picture of what has been happening, he said.

The sea that receded from Florida's shores thousands of years ago was beginning to come back, naturally and slowly — until the Industrial Revolution began filling the atmosphere with greenhouse gases, warming the oceans and speeding up the process.

"Prior to the 1800s, the rates are fairly constant," Savarese said. That rate varied from about 1 1/2 to 3 inches a century, he said.

But now, thanks to the warming of the planet, Savarese said, the sea level is increasing by a rate of 15 to nearly 20 inches per century along that part of the Florida coast.

As the sea rises, it changes the land. For instance, as the trees die and fall over at Waccasassa preserve in Levy County, Putz said, "you can see the forest changing to marsh."

Something similar has been happening at Rookery Bay, said administrator Gary Lytton of the state Department of Environmental Protection. Comparing aerial photos of the area from the 1920s to what's there now shows how mangroves have replaced freshwater marshes that are important habitat for a variety of bird and fish species.

"You can see an ecological shift that's taking place," he said. "We're beginning to lose freshwater wetland habitat."

One of the more surprising discoveries is what Savarese found amid the maze of marshes and mangroves that form the Ten Thousand Islands: inland tidal pools that are "growing in size and increasing in number. They should eventually come together and form a new body of water. We're creating a new set of bays inland of our own."

• • •

How long will it take before sea level rise begins to cause major changes?

If you ask Harold Wanless, chairman of the University of Miami's geological sciences department who studies how the coastlines of South Florida have evolved over the past 4,000 years, he will give you one answer.

Wanless believes the rate will continue increasing until it surpasses 3 feet by the end of this century, and could even reach 5 feet. That "basically takes all of our barrier islands and makes them close to unlivable," he said.

But Wanless' predictions surpass what scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey have found so far in their studies from around the nation's coastline.

If the seas rise twice as much in the next century as they did in the last, "I wouldn't classify that as a catastrophe, putting everyone underwater, but you will start seeing major changes on our coastline," said Abby Sallenger, an oceanographer with the U.S. Geological Survey's center for Coastal and Watershed Studies.

The scientific uncertainty has left public officials unsure how to deal with the problem.

"I don't think that anybody's really pinned down numbers that make sense yet," said Ed Chesney, Clearwater's environmental manager. "You're talking 8 inches or 8 feet. & The jury's still out on that timetable."

"At some point it will pose a threat to our drinking water supply. Our subterranean aquifers will get some saltwater intrusion at some point," Ruvin said.

But that point could be decades in the future, which leads to apathy now, says Robert Brinkmann, a University of South Florida geography professor.

"As a society," he said, "it's hard for us to get our hands around how we plan for sea level change when it's not on our doorstop right now."

http://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/globalwar
ming/article435224.ece

16 Comments | Add a Comment

Here is a lesson for the mentally challenged on this site.

IMPORTANT - AS THIS WILL BE A MAJOR CHALLENGE FOR YOU, BE SURE TO READ ALL DIRECTIONS AT LEAST 5 TIMES BEFORE ATTEMPTING!

If someone mentions a particular blog on the “my fox” site by name:

1)If you lack the ability to remember the blog's name, take out your crayons and write it in large letters on a poster board. Also write down the exact location you are now at, but do not write this on the same poster board - use a permanent marker and write this on your arm and also on your bedroom wall.

2)VERY IMPORTANT - resist the temptation to go to any of your favorite propaganda web sites, remind yourself that this blog is on this site & challenge yourself to actually find it.

3)Go to the page that shows all the blogs - follow this carefully because it may confuse you - you get to this page by clicking on the “See all ____ Blogs” link

4)Once you find this page (or had someone find it for you), you now have to locate where you scribbled the blog’s name with your crayons.

5)Although you have nothing better to do in your worthless life, do not spend more than a few days trying to find your scribble. Simply go back to the beginning.

6)VERY IMPORTANT - resist the temptation to go to any of your favorite propaganda web sites, remind yourself that this blog is on this site & challenge yourself to actually find it.

7)Now you see why it was so important to write the exact location in permanent ink. Once you locate on your arm or bedroom wall where you wrote the location, return to Step 1 and start over. Of course the 1st time you wrote the location as “sitting in front of the computer in my bedroom”. This is why it is so important to read these directions 5 times before attempting. Do not blame yourself for not having the ability to realize the location you were supposed to write down was where someone else mentioned the particular blog that you don’t understand how to find. Calm down, take a deep breath, and remember - you are special.

8)VERY IMPORTANT - resist the temptation to go to any of your favorite propaganda web sites, remind yourself that this blog is on this site & challenge yourself to actually find it.

9)Assuming the computer has not become extinct before you figure out how to complete Steps 3 & 4, congratulate yourself. See, you are special.

10)Now simply scroll down until you locate the blog that someone mentioned. This may take a few minutes (or in your case a few months) but you have nothing better to do than smooch butt anyway.

To save yourself the trouble of trying to understand these simple instructions, instead have someone with an IQ higher than you* take about 2 minutes to find the blog.

*this is easy, most people have IQ’s higher than 2 - but don’t fret, you are special

Hope this helps floydfreak. Pass this on to the other DA’s like you on here. Never mind. Like you, it won’t help others with IQ’s of 2 either.

6 Comments | Add a Comment

Now Republican John McCain claims he opposed President Bush's tax cuts because they didn't come with spending cuts. He now claims he voted against the Bush tax cuts because he wanted to rein in spending. He now claims "I disagreed when we had tax cuts without spending restraint".

This flip-flop does not agree with McCain's comments when he opposed the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

In 2001, McCain said the tax cuts favored the wealthy at the expense of the middle class. In 2003, he said there should be no tax cuts until the Iraq war costs were known.

16 Comments | Add a Comment

Chunk of Antarctic ice shelf collapses

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

WASHINGTON -- A chunk of Antarctic ice about seven times the size of Manhattan suddenly collapsed, putting an even greater portion of glacial ice at risk, scientists said Tuesday.

Satellite images show the runaway disintegration of a 160-square-mile chunk in western Antarctica, which started Feb. 28. It was the edge of the Wilkins ice shelf and has been there for hundreds, maybe 1,500 years.

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/natio
nal_world&id=6042399

65 Comments | Add a Comment


HEAFFA2DA

Enjoys proving the zero IQ's of political wackos. The fun begins when they realize their lack of intelligence. Their typical way of then slithering away & crawling under a rock is to A)deny they said what they said (even if it's 2 posts earlier within same blog), B)say the same BS over & over (knowing that those on their same IQ level will then believe it must be correct since they heard it somewhere before), C)wimply delete posts on their blogs that show them for what they are, D)refer to you by changing your screen name (not abbreviating, but such as Annie Fanny - remember 3rd grade) or, E)the ultimate compliment, post blogs that a 3rd grader would be proud of under a take off of your screen name. Look at their posts, then sadly realize these individuals vote. Then you will have a better idea of why our country is in the mess it's in.

Member Since: 3/21/2008