RNC08's Blog

   So as most of you know Obama the “phenomenon” is a media spun event developed on his first two books and spun way out of control (shoved down our throats by a media gone mad) . What you may not know is that Obama has made audio CD's of both his books and placed them (with the help of boat loads of money from the DNC) in every market they can ...but before you rush out to buy a copy and listen to Obama reading the entire book to you word for word check this out . The general release of “the audacity of hope” was delayed (after the release LOL) so that can be reedited ! Thats right now that Obama is in a national race for the white house he is not happy with his proud and allegedly true telling of his own life story . Gone are some of his statements of love for Islam over the rest of the world , gone are his statements about Americas “crimes” in north Africa , gone are the points where he quoted his preacher word for word in inditing THIS country for its actions in the world...we can't let this man rewrite his history! We must fight to keep him from hiding who and what he REALY IS.

No “flag” for Obama !

So first he refused to put the flag pin on his chest (only later to put it on any way when he realized it was costing him votes) and now he has unveiled the new paint job on his campaign jet complete with the removal of the the flag of this country from its tail , it has been replaced by his personal campaign symbol . Story link here: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pa
geId=70236#

So what do you think ? Is this guy “to good” for the flag ? Is this another of his “changes” ? Or is his ego just that BIG ?

  So we are talking about Reverend Jacksons comments (because the media wants us to talk about it) but why are we not talking about the Obama “plan” that has him so mad ? Is it because this idea has been so universally hated by Democrats on such a historic scale , or is more the fact that this plan is a direct attack on churches ?

  So here we go again an oil billionaire is advocating a “plan” to end our dependency on foreign oil, go to www.pickensplan.com ...he is pushing for “Wind power” and even has a nice wind map on his cite to show us how much power is available....LOL

OK so here is the thing , he fails to point out any of the important facts about Wind power (and for good reason) Fact 1 “wind power” is useless in most of America because wind comes in two categories in most places non existent (no power) and so strong that it destroys wind generators...potential for wind power generation in Florida is “0” ! Fact 2 Wind power can only replace our dependency on coal (look at the graph on his own cite!) its a dead end and a distraction from our oil consumption ! And * is that not very convenient for an oil tycoon ? Pushing an idea that will not affect his pocket ! LOL

One more thing he mentions natural gas , I can say that we do have tremendous amounts of natural gas in this country BUT he is opposed to any and all drilling in this country and fails to point out that you must drill for NG ...he “talks a good game” put sticks the knife in when you are not looking !

You all failed to embrace Ethanol/solar/wind/atomic/NG power plans when they where proposed by an Oil man (President Bush) why would anyone respond to a narrower outlook from yet another oil man? ...

Solar power -V- Ethanol from “corn starch” the largest solar power plant in America Nevada Solar One produces 65 KW* of power per day that is 2336 KW per year (sort of LOL) and covers 300 acres of land (for the collector only , the entire facility covers/uses 400 acres ) .

On the other hand a single acer of corn produces 8700 KW of power per acer per crop (most places in America have two crops per year and Florida is able to produce as many as 4 crops per year) so in the poorest area of America a place the size of Nevada solar one produces 3480,000 KW of portable usable power per year.

Add to this the fact that ethanol can be produced from farm waste instead of corn starch and it is obvious what direction we should be going in ! To bad our government is so heavily invested in oil profit that actually solving our “energy problems” is the very last thing they would ever do! So we will once again see nothing but billions of dollars wasted on solar power scams and add campaigns against ethanol.

* to add insult to injury Nevada solar one produces 14% of its power from natural gas and has not consistently produced 64 KW a day yet !

Today Iran has threatened to “use every toll at its disposal” to counter any attack (including self defense in their own country) by Israel including using “its” control over the Gulf Straights ...40% of all the world oil goes threw this region , so Iran has just threatened to cut the world off if it does not “tolerate” its invasion of Israel

So what response do you think we should make to this threat ? Perhaps Obama should take a moment and go and “talk” to them NOW ...I mean he is the “dictator whisperer” right ? He knows magic words that will bring peace instantly ...Hell IF (and only IF) he could disarm Iran before November I would vote for he ! LOL

Why when we are all suffering so badly are we being asked to send MORE money to Africa ? Why is their problem MY emergency ?

We have “aids” and poverty HERE , we have suffering in this country why and how can I not be angry that we are giving our tax dollars to them and not using them to help our people

Denver's City Council president is getting hammered with hate-filled messages in response to Tuesday's surprise performance of the "Black National Anthem" by a jazz singer during a city event.

Chanteuse Rene Marie had been invited by Mayor John Hickenlooper's office to sing the national anthem during his annual State of the City address.

Council President Michael Hancock, who is black, was the master of ceremonies. He introduced Marie, who sang what is known as the "Black National Anthem" instead.

Her performance evoked angry reactions among some of the estimated 700 people at the event.

Marie sang the first verse of James Weldon Johnson's Lift Ev'ry Voice and Sing, also known as the "Black National Anthem," but adapted those lyrics to the tune of the The Star-Spangled Banner.

In a statement late Tuesday, Hickenlooper said: "I'm disappointed that this matter has been a distraction from the great work and significant accomplishments of our city employees over the past year and the many important initiatives on tap for the coming year."

Hickenlooper said in an interview that he spoke to Marie after the ceremony and that she apologized profusely for any problems she may have caused him.

The mayor also said that Marie told him she meant no disrespect.

"She blended the two songs together," Hickenlooper said. "She was trying to make an artistic expression of her love for the country. She did not intend to make a political statement or anything."

Marie said she had no regrets. She deliberately didn't tell anybody about her song choice "because I don't think it is necessary for an artist to ask permission to express themselves artistically," she said.

"I would not change a thing," Marie said.

So what do you think guys was this NOT a political statement as the singer says, is it OK to pretend to be singing a long held song of national strength an unity but once you have the stage instead push a secular separatist agenda ? ...Are we even talking about a song here or are we talking about the open determination of some blacks to drive us all further apart !

  It is called “Hanuman” , it is a Hindu god and Obama carries it in his pocket for good luck. Funny that no American Media has noticed this item because the eastern world has , in India and parts of the far east prayer meetings in support of Obama are now under way because he is considered a “believer” and a “lord” in the way of the Monkey god Hanuman. Funny that he would have a symbol of possibly the most violent Hindu God of them all (look him up in the Ramayana ) ...leave it to Obama to find the Malcolm X in a pacifist religion .

So what do you think about having a President that fallows the “path” of the monkey war god ? LOL

  It will be interesting to see Obama supporters rationalize this one away by stating that he does not “believe” in this or that ...but as we have already seen him state that he did not pay attention to what was going on in his church for 20 some years we he is open to speculation about what (if anything) he does believe in.

In a post this week a definition of “liberal” was posted (with out a corresponding definition of Conservative). Not only did I find it misleading in the scope and scale of its definition I like most people found it did apply to myself but only because it (wrongly) described aspects of political view points that are not addressed in the words Liberal or Conservative.

This is a link to a very small quiz that explains a lot about the four corners of political opinion :

http://www.theadvocates.org/quizp/index.html

I have found that this test is pretty accurate and no mater how many times i take it (the questions change every so often) I am always a “centrist” leaning to Libertarian . This is true because I find that in a perfect world I would be a true hard core Libertarian , but I am willing to accept some level of government RE: Police and National defense...and not much els that the government is doing seems like a good idea to me !

For those of you who did not take the test this is what definitions are used for scoring :

Other Political Philosophies

Right (Conservative)

Conservatives tend to favor economic freedom, but frequently

support laws to restrict personal behavior that violates "traditional
values." They oppose excessive government control of business,

while endorsing government action to defend morality and the

traditional family structure. Conservatives usually support a strong

military, oppose bureaucracy and high taxes, favor a free-market

economy, and endorse strong law enforcement.

Left (Liberal)

Liberals usually embrace freedom of choice in personal

matters, but tend to support significant government control of the

economy. They generally support a government-funded "safety net"
to help the disadvantaged, and advocate strict regulation

of business. Liberals tend to favor environmental regulations,

defend civil liberties and free expression, support government action

to promote equality, and tolerate diverse lifestyles.

Libertarian

Libertarians support maximum liberty in both personal and

economic matters. They advocate a much smaller government; one
that is limited to protecting individuals from coercion and violence.

Libertarians tend to embrace individual responsibility, oppose

government bureaucracy and taxes, promote private charity, tolerate

diverse lifestyles, support the free market, and defend civil liberties.

Statist (Big Government)
Statists want government to have a great deal of power over the

economy and individual behavior. They frequently doubt whether

economic liberty and individual freedom are practical options in

today's world. Statists tend to distrust the free market, support

high taxes and centralized planning of the economy, oppose

diverse lifestyles, and question the importance of civil liberties.

 I think most of you will find that you are NOT liberal or conservative but lean farther to Libertarian and statist ...and most of our arguments stem not from a trued ideological difference that can be described as LIV-V-CON but is far more often my Libertarian fighting your liberal as it leans to statist ...etc.