SEEDUB's Blog

IF WE SEE , THE DANGER BE ,

ONLY FREE , TO ANOTHER DEGREE ,

THE FEE CANT BE , WHEN YOUR FREE ,

VOTE AND SEE , NOT SERIOUS SEE ,

TO HAVE A FEE , OR FIGHT FOR FREE ,

TO BE FREE ,

NEW FREEDOM FREE ,IS FROM ME ,

THE SOUND SEE , IS RINGING FREE ,

RING FREEDOM FREE , BY VOTE YA SEE ,

FREEDOMFREE ,

WILL FREE YOU FREE ,

POWER YOU BACK , THE RIGHT TO BE ,

VOTING FREE , FOR FREEDOMFREE ,

HATTERS SEE , REALITY ,

GLAD TO BE , VOTING YOU FREE ,

IT WILL ALLWAYS BE ,THE POWER TO FREE ,

FEE YOU SEE , IS SAFTEY ,

BRIEFING FREE , FROM FREEDOMFREE ,

EACH WEEK BE , MORE TIME TO SEE ,

SLAVERY ,

IS ALL FREE , AND A FEE ,

OLD FREEDOM FEE ,YOU KNOW ME ,

FREEDOMFREE ,

DOES NOT AGREE , WITH THE FEE ,

SO YOU SEE , TO BE FREE ,

WRITE IN ME , FREEDOMFREE ,

ELECTION TIME ,IS TOMARROW SEE ,

THE CHANGE BE , IN ONE DAY FREE ,

I've Just herd that Carl Rove is the next Rat to get off the sinking ship!

Bush and Cheney are Fools; it's obvious that they went in to Iraq for all the wrong reasons. If they would have taken time to THINK about what was going on we wouldn’t be stuck in this Quagmire. This Administration is the WORST, in the History of America, and you don’t have to be a military man to see this. The active troops in Iraq include Denmark, Australia, Poland, United Kingdom, and of course the U.S., the Way I see it that’s five Countries that‘s really putting up man power. 98% of the military is from the U.S. and Britain and is therefore accurately described as a predominantly Anglo-American force rather than as a coalition.
United States: 250,000 invasion--158,000 current (6/07)
United Kingdom: 45,000 invasion--5,500 current (5/07)
Poland: 194 invasion--2,500 peak--900 current (2/07)
Australia: 2,000 invasion--638 current (2/07)
Denmark: 300 invasion--430 peak--180 current (7/07)

There’s are 18 other countries with less than 100 troops in Iraq

Many nations received monetary and other incentives from the United States in return for sending troops to or otherwise supporting the Iraq war. "Bribery”.
Below is a partial list of some of the incentives offered to coalition members?
Turkey - Turkey was offered approximately $8.5 billion in loans in exchange for sending 10,000 peacekeeping troops in 2003. Even though the US did say the loans and the sending of troops to Iraq were not directly linked, it also said the loans are contingent upon "cooperation" on Iraq.

Singapore - In May 2003 the Bush Administration signed a free trade agreement with Singapore, the first with an Asian country. In announcing the deal, President Bush hailed Singapore as "a strong partner in the war on terrorism and a member of the coalition on Iraq." Asia Times columnist Jeffrey Robertson argued was a reward for Singapore's support of the Iraq invasion.

Australia: In 2004 the Bush Administration "fast tracked" a free trade agreement with Australia. The Sydney Morning Herald called the deal a "reward" for Australia's contribution of troops to the Iraq invasion.

Great Britain: As of 2006, the Independent reported that British companies have received at least £1.1bn contracts for reconstruction work in postwar Iraq.

I'm confused on something, in what way are we not safer than 9/11? Last I heard we haven't been hit since then or am I missing something?
Maybe we invaded for the wrong reasons, but it's sucking most of the terrorist to Iraq. I rather fight there than here. Hell I rather fight there than fight in Detroit and by meaning Detroit, I see more senseless murders. At least in Iraq I can shoot back! I've lost 14 friends in both Wars since'01. But I will tell you this, if the military was allowed to do what they're trained for instead of the left-wing media showing the negitive, people would think twice.
Are you a cut-in-run person? Don't vote for the supplies the Soldiers needs. If you are, that's ok. If you think the war is stupid like you say, that's ok too, you have that right. But don't say "what did we achieve", because I'm about 99.9% sure you didn't go over there. I'll tell you what I achieved when I was there. Ask me and I'll tell you.

DO you approve of Bush Sending our Boys over in harms way just because he wants to give Al-Qaeda an easier target then Americans in America? That Logic is flawed you being a military man and all, is that why didn’t you re-enlist?
P.S. I think that Iraq has a few more senseless murders than Detroit. Speaking of Detroit Mr. Tough Military man. When was the last time you’ve been to Detroit? Don’t drink all the kool-aid save some for bush and Cheney.
LMMFAO
P.S.S. Your Damn Skippy I didn’t go to Iraq!!!!!

wolakp,

I'm for pulling out of Iraq because we shouldn't be involved in their civil war. You feel Al Queda is the resistance against us, but I would beg to differ. I ask you to consider if this happened here, would you not fight with all you had to get the Iraqis off our soil? Now that's just part of the reason. The other is we are establishing a democratic society and they have lived with Church and State joined together for what a couple of thousand years. Who are we to decide that there whole way of life is wrong? I am for getting back to going after Bin Lauden and the boys I just don't think after the way George has handled Iraq that another country will want us on their soil.

Tallmanok2,

Let say we do pull out of Iraq, they continue to have their Civil War. I really don't care who wins in their Civil War. The problem lays if a certain side starts to lose, a certain country will get involved to prevent their side to lose, like Iran or Saudi. Now look at the Kurds in the North. I have a friend working there, helping dispose unexploded ordnance and he wrote me that it's a totally different county. The Kurds only issue is Turkey, Turkey thinks that the Kurds are terrorist. The problem I see is that one faction was so surpressed by another faction for so long they want payback. That's my opinion about their Civil War. But if you notice, be don't have troops where the Kurds live. There's no need, they get along.

wolakp

Why yes I do Vote, and you were the one who brought Detroit into this conversation. “Hell I rather fight there than fight in Detroit and by meaning Detroit, I see more senseless murders. At least in Iraq I can shoot back!” Does this refresh your memory? It’s also very cute to say “I'm not going to argue with someone that didn't go over there and doesn't have a clue what we are doing.” Are you talking to me or Bush, because he has never served and he DIFFINITELY doesn’t have a clue!!! LMMFAO!!!! I believe you just have a weak Argument about this war, and that's why you have nothing to say. I really do appreciate your service to our country, God bless you! Thanks for serving so I can have my own opinion, that‘s very noble of you. I know you had me in mind when you enlisted 20 years ago. Like I said this quagmire is still going on and we are still no safer now than before 9/11.
Our troops should have been used much wiser, like going after who attacked us, not over throwing a government that had no way to hurt the U.S. To have “peace” over their in that country we ether have to kill all the people who hate us being there, which is a whole lot of people, or leave and have all the people who supported our invasion killed. What would you consider a “WIN” in Iraq? What did you achieve over there?

LOL @ RAt with one t