MyFox
 

Just Another Brick in the Wall

by jabitw from Central Florida

Last Post 10 days, 17 hours Ago


Extortion:
1. An exorbitant charge*
2. Unjust exaction (as by the misuse of authority)*
3. The felonious act of extorting money (as by threats of violence)*
4. Law. the crime of obtaining money or some other thing of value by the abuse of one's office or authority.**

* WordWeb A One-click English dictionary, thesaurus and reference. (it's free!)
**Dictionary.com (not a site I recommend as it is very slow and laden with advertisements)

Today we witness my number one pet peeve: Police Extortion. No, this act is legal because they do it in the name of justice and protecting the people.

Case in point: San Diego State University. I just finished watching the bulk of the news conference where they discussed the methods by which they caught 'the bad guys'. First, they arrested many people (the bulk of the total 96 arrests) for things like possession and those involved in overdose situations. The information gleaned from these students went into the planning of "Operation Sudden Fall" which resulted in more arrests today as well as at least two arrests last week.

Here's the part that pizzes me off...These people arrested for possession, I am absolutely confident, did not run into the police station saying "I have drugs and I want to turn in the person that sold them to me!" Quite the contrary - the police arrested them, slapped them with every charge they could think of, let them sweat it out a while, then offered a deal (i.e. they don't go to jail) for their 'cooperation'. Please refer to the definition of Extortion above - in particular, definition #4.

In this case, the item of value is a persons reputation and/or a prison sentence. What was extorted was not money, but information. The abuse comes when a government representative (be that a D.A., DEA Agent, FBI Agent, Police Officer, etc.) treats one person differently than they do another. To be more specific, the normal course of action when catching a person in possession of pot is to issue a citation - just like a speeding ticket. (If you don't believe me, look at the last traffic citation you or someone you know received - there is a check box for possession). However, in this case, there was more to be gained by police - the names of the dealers. So, the individual was arrested, terrorized and extorted. According to the President of San Diego State University, all of these students were immediately expelled from school. Regardless of the deals given by police, these people have little to no future because they did exactly what is expected of every good college student - they experimented with drugs. But then again, I guess they still have a chance to become president...

So what have we gained from allowing the government to terrorize its citizens? An investigation that lasted a year, involved dozens of agents, cost taxpayers millions of dollars (so far - the trials and incarcerations will probably triple that) and in the end managed to seize far fewer drugs than they could have gotten by raiding any celebrities weekend stash.

Before anyone starts accusing me of promoting Anarchy or endorsing the legalization of drugs, don't. This isn't about any such thing. It is entirely about how we allow our government to abuse the rights of ordinary citizens because we feel that it is 'for the greater good'. If you don't think it will ever happen to you, then you are naive. Not only can it, but odds are it has or will happen to you or someone you love.

I can cite examples with at least eight friends of mine that, in the last ten years, have been subject to such situations. The most dramatic of which, landed a friend in a windowless room, facing a Secret Service Agent. When he demanded an attorney, the agent told him (and I quote) "We can make you disappear. [pause for effect] Now, you're going to tell me everything I want to know...". Needless to say, he cooperated.

I'm not anti-government or anything, but we have to remember, the only power the government has is the authority we grant it - this is our guarantee by the constitution. The converse is also true - we have the right, and it is our responsibility, to take away any power we have granted the government that has been abused. In the end, if we let them violate our rights, we're responsible. Know your rights, and don't let anyone give them - or take them - away.
5 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 5
Page 1 of 1
mmustangg read my blog view my photos
May 6, 2008 | 4:50 PM

You mean they arrested a bunch of drug users?
FANTASTIC! I say they should do this all the time! Maybe if people knew they would screw up the rest of their life, they wouldn't touch the stuff in the first place! They should have been there to learn, not to get high! Now we have 96 more examples of stupidity to show our children!

Vittorio read my blog view my photos
May 7, 2008 | 11:51 AM

You got anything?

jabitw read my blog
May 7, 2008 | 1:00 PM

Not sure I get what you're asking Vitt...

Vittorio read my blog view my photos
May 9, 2008 | 11:01 AM

Oh, sorry. I thought perhaps you were a recreational user in the past. I was. We used to ask that question instead of saying "hello".

jabitw read my blog
May 9, 2008 | 3:04 PM

:) Oh. I get it. I've heard that before, but being one of the 4% of Americans that can HONESTLY claim that I have never even sampled, I wasn't thinking in those terms.

That said, I suppose I should add that I don't see any reason for users to be punished for what they do in private. I do maintain a vigilant concern to public safety (i.e. Driving Under the Influence, etc.). But I steadfastly reject the 'right' of the government to tell you what you can eat, smoke, drink, or f-word in your bedroom (with the obvious exception of minor children).

This country was founded on the purest principal of freedom - the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness (Yes, I know that's in the Declaration of Independence, not in the Constitution). Regardless, it was a founding principle and there was no caveat that said "except when it offends your neighbors self-serving moral arrogance".

"But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong" --Dennis Miller

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




jabitw

About me is a computer, printer, shelf, chest of drawers and a bed. About that are more rooms with more stuff, and about that, a cacophony of apartments, businesses, houses, vehicles, plants, and enough sand to make a sandbox for every child in the Midwest - with plenty leftover. Amongst all this aboutness are dozens, hundreds, thousands - even millions of nameless, faceless people, quietly milling about their lilliputian lives. OK, some aren't all that quiet. In the midst of it all we find me. Of no more significance than the others, perhaps, except that by electing to share my consciousness with you, I am bigger than my self.

Member Since: 4/16/2008