MyFox
 

jfore's Blog

by jfore

Last Post 1 day, 10 hours Ago


It seems that whenever Hillary (or, if you prefer, Billary) says something outrageous it isn’t long before her supporters will jump to her defense by saying, "She had to say that to satisfy her base." Well there is one group that Hillary doesn’t have to pander to. They love her just the way she is. They’re the Islamic Terrorists.

.

Aaron Klein, the Jerusalem bureau chief for WorldNetDaily, recently published a book and devoted a part of it to finding out which American politicians the terrorists liked best. He found out that the overwhelming favorite of the terrorists was, you guessed it, the Democrats in general, and Hillary Clinton in particular. Klein said, "The terrorists understand very well the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans, and they see that a lot of Democratic presidential candidates are competing with each other on who would withdraw from Iraq first, who would create dialogue with Iran, dialogue with Syria, cease fires with some of the insurgent leaders."

.

According to Klein, the terrorist leaders understand that it is in their best interests for Democrats to gain the political upper hand in the United States. That’s why all of bin Ladin’s recent videos basically regurgitate Democrat talking points. Do you really think that bin Ladin give a rat’s rear end about uninsured Americans? But he was sure to mention them in his latest tape. Listen to Ahmadinejad’s speeches. He tends to repeat points that have been written by the staff at the DNC.

.

Klein talked to Hamas leader Ahmed Yousuf and he says that Yousuf has nothing but praise for Mrs. Clinton. Klein said, "He believes that the Palestinian ticket to victory is Hillary Clinton and he’s just one of literally dozens of senior terrorist leaders that I talked to..." Klein says that the consensus among the terrorists is that a Clinton victory in 2008 would open the door for them to impose Islam and Sharia Law onto the rest of the world. That includes the United States, folks.

.

Klein went on, "These terrorists.... are looking to get America out of the Middle East and to destroy Israel. But these are just means to an end. They’re ultimately looking to spread their brand of Islam in the Middle East and Europe, and ultimately to the United States of America. So they’re going to support any political party or candidate that would try to push through their short term goal." The terrorists ..."apparently believe that Hillary Clinton, in particular, is that candidate."

Well, look at the bright side. Any terrorist who enters New York illegally won’t have to travel by cab. Hillary will see to it that they have driver’s licenses.

17 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 17
Page 1 of 1
ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 20, 2007 | 5:19 PM

Weird, I wonder why they wouldn't support Ron Paul, not that I want terrorist to join my cause but isn't Ron Paul the candidate that will end the war immediately? Probably because Ron Paul would actually go after the real terrorist and not distract America with wars for global domination.

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 20, 2007 | 5:40 PM

I need to study up more on Israel/Palestine history and current events. I found it really shocking to learn last week that the International American Red Cross was actually holding classes and training Palestine fighters on Humanitarian Warfare Law and First Aid. The Bush Administration seems to support both Saudi Arabia and Israel but that seems to be a big conflict of interests in the future pending the outcome of Iraq and Iran. The Red Cross has major political influence so it wasn't just their decision to support Palestine. I wonder if the US will eventually turn against Israel itself. It's a scary thought.

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Nov 20, 2007 | 7:01 PM

Hillary being elected must happen to bring about the end. I believe it will happen in December 2012. this will be a few weeks after a presidential election.
I believe after 4 years of Hitlery, this country will be so screwed up, there will be no hope. She will lose re-election because of the state of the union, and WW3 will start before the new Republican "hawk" takes office. The terrorists, after 4 years of planning, and unlimited access to the U.S., will put thier plans into action, before they are thwarted by a new Republican president.
Much like 9/11 but on a far larger scale, with a nuclear armed Iran, Syria, and others joining in for the last war.

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Nov 20, 2007 | 7:05 PM

I have no fear though, as I know that God will not let man destroy the earth in a nuclear holocaust. I believe He will step in, in the form of Jesus, and put a stop to it.

rexsmom read my blog view my photos
Nov 21, 2007 | 9:53 AM

Why am I so not suprised?

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 21, 2007 | 11:02 AM

I'm willing to bet Hilary wins next year and in 4 years Jeb Bush will run if we still have a Republic by then. The Clintons and Bushes have run a racket on the US for almost 20 years. They keep getting elected through a corrupt voting system and the bought media they own. We have to rely on them making a mistake or someone leaking information to the public to get any justice.

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Nov 21, 2007 | 7:07 PM

TT, for the first time ever, I think you are making some sort of sense.
After 4 years of Hitlery, Jeb will be our only hope!
I love Jeb, and he did a great job in Florida as Governor. He is the first ever Republican Governor to be re-elected in Florida!
I wish he could run now! It is too soon, but after 4 years of Hitlery this country will be begging for him to run!
I am sure he will carry Florida!

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Nov 21, 2007 | 7:13 PM

But as I stated, it will be too late. Once the terrorists know they don't have 8 years, they will put thier 4 year plan into action before Jeb takes office.

Kiss your ass goodbye!

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 4:02 PM

Jeb's been a great politician. He has to be if he plans on winning a Presidency down the road. But keep in mind he is a founding member of the PNAC organization and their goal is to have a one world government (The United Nations) supported by a world army (NATO), in order to do this you have to group all of the nations into unions (North American Union consisting of Mexico, Canada, and the United States) and all of the countries under the United Nations must abide by international and domestic laws of their territories as stated by UN Resolutions not by sovereign law such as the Constitution.

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 4:24 PM

I don't see how you could support a Bush or a Clinton. But like most Americans we sit here and point a finger at each party when in reality it's both parties that are killing America. If you support the Bush family your supporting a corrupt government that will end the sovereignty of The United States. If you support the Clinton family your supporting a corrupt government that will end the sovereignty of The United States. In the shadows they are working together on this. If you are happy with the way the Bush Administration is running things then Hilary Clinton is your choice for President. They both have the same goals and in reality answer to the same bosses. The Bosses are the Bilderberg Group, the United Nations, NATO, and the think tank for their strategy is the CFR and the RAND Corporation.

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 6:15 PM

OK. I briefly thought you were making some sort of sense. My mistake.

TT: "If you are happy with the way the Bush Administration is running things then Hilary Clinton is your choice for President."

What? Now that makes no sense at all!

Polar opposites!

If you are happy with a positive, then a negative is your choice. That is what you are saying. How rediculous!

Do you truly believe the crap you spew, or are you just putting us on?

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 6:21 PM

I am not happy with the Bush Administration, but I think it could have been worse. Let's just say I am satisfied it is not worse.
But now a real threat.

Hitlery.

As worse as worse can be.

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 10:33 PM

What she says and what she does is two different things. She has voted in favor with the majority of the Republicans on all the votes that have gone through the Senate this year except when it came to health care. So as far as the Bush Administration goes, Clinton is right in there voting with them regardless of what she says. You should know what she says and what she does is entirely opposite.

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 10:37 PM

Your only seeing an illusion if you think Bush and Clinton are polar opposites. What issues are they opposed on? It's only an illusion that she is anti-war. She's voted in favor of the Iraq war on every vote that has gone through the Senate.

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 10:42 PM

Like I said before, the Bilderberg group decides who will be President of the United States. If the Middle East conflicts are going well the Republican candidate will win, if things are not going well the Democrat Candidate will win. There is a plan A and a plan B and that is the only difference in the candidates you will be made to believe you voted for. They both still answer to the same boss and I'm afraid the American people are not the boss.

ThinkTanked read my blog view my photos
Nov 25, 2007 | 10:45 PM

You will never understand me if you don't bother to do some research on your own and try to figure out what's going on in the world. You might think I'm a nut right now but in 2 years you'll be looking back at all this and realize I was speaking truth.

DaytonaFrank read my blog view my photos
Nov 26, 2007 | 6:57 PM

TT, yes I do think you are a nut, and that is putting it mildly.
"What she says and what she does are two different things"
I do agree with that assessment, although I would have said what she does, and then what she says later are two opposites! She DID vote for the war, but now wants the troops out today. She is no leader, and does not know her own mind about anything. She just wants to be president, and will say or do anything to achieve that end.
She is a real threat to the United States, and everything we stand for.

I do not need research to know that obvious truth. It is as plain as the tongue hanging out of your mouth!

She has very much anti-American values, and I have known this for years.

If she becomes president, start preparing for the worst.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




jfore

I'm a new user who hasn’t written a bio yet.

Member Since: 11/1/2006