MyFox
 

jfore's Blog

by jfore

Last Post 1 day, 10 hours Ago


Well folks it has begun. In light of the June 12, 2008 Supreme Court ruling that gave Guantanamo Bay detainees access to American courts the U. S. District Court of Appeals in Washington DC ruled today that a Chinese Muslim named Huzaifa Parhat can no longer be considered an enemy combatant and should be released. Parhat is one of several Chinese Uyghurs, a Chinese Separatist group living in Afghanistan with known ties to al Qaeda, who are being held in Guantanamo. The government has been trying to find a country willing to accept the Uighurs but, so far, have had no luck. The court said that since there is no evidence that Parhat had actually picked up a gun an fired at any Americans, he must be released. Who knows, maybe the Liberals on the court will allow him to move into your neighborhood. Get ready, this is only the beginning, folks.

29 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 29
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 23, 2008 | 2:48 PM

"The court said that since there is no evidence that Parhat had actually picked up a gun an fired at any Americans"

By THAT logic almost ALL of the Nazis tried at Nuremburg SHOULD have been released..

dks75 read my blog
Jun 23, 2008 | 2:58 PM

from what you said is that all Americans can be defined as terrorists because of a couple that were. The Uyghurs are a distinct ethnic group with their own language. They are equivalent to the Tibetans. The ones that leave china are labeled as terrorists by china and Kazakhstan.

You know if I was being detained for anything I'd want to make sure there'd be the slightest amount of evidence. Even if it was incorrect, I'd be alot happier. Modern day Salem witch trials or Spanish Inquisition or actually going after those that are bad. A little of both IMO.

tracylaud83 read my blog view my photos
Jun 23, 2008 | 5:07 PM

Send them home to China, and wash are hands from it.
WAIT
Then they will kill them with no trial, and we will be blamed for that also.
We are Da*** if we do, and Da**** if we don't.

ADeltonian read my blog view my photos
Jun 23, 2008 | 7:10 PM

Open the gates wide open, then shoot them all as they try to escape.
No more worries then.

yellowdog read my blog view my photos
Jun 23, 2008 | 7:29 PM

Dick and Dumb have never let anything as trivial as evidence, probable cause, fairness, basic human rights, the Geneva Convention, the United States Constitution, or even DUE PROCESS for AMERICAN CITIZENS, slow down their criminal disregard for justice and THE LAW.

This is one of the darkest chapters in our history and puts these criminals on the same plane as other despots in history.

If not for the balance of the judiciary, these goons would feel free to treat any perceived "enemy" the same way...you may have been next if not for the brave Judges.

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 23, 2008 | 10:07 PM

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says last week's 5-4 Supreme Court ruling that awards Constitutional Eights to terrorist suspects in Guantanamo Bay "will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed."

Scalia, in his blistering dissent to the Constitutional decision, says the court majority is laying the groundwork for the early release of “some very dangerous people.”..

Scalia notes that one previously released prisoner from the detention camp in Cuba was found to have detonated a suicide bomb in Iraq in May..

“The game of bait-and-switch that this opinion plays upon the nation's commander in chief will make the war harder on us,” Scalia declares. “It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed. That consequence would be tolerable if necessary to preserve a time-honored legal principle vital to our constitutional republic, but it is this court's blatant abandonment of such a principle that produces [this decision,” he says.

It simply CANNOT be said better then THAT..
Contrary to what the ACLU HACK above says,, THIS is the FIRST time that Prisoners of War,, in a TIME of War,, have been granted Constitutional Rights generally reserved for American Citizens..It has NEVER been done before,, It IS never done ANYWHERE else….Generally Speaking..Prisoners of War are held for the Duration of the War…Between the OUTRAGEOUS decision by the LIBERAL Majority of the Supreme Court and the OBVIOUS LIES and Accusations leveled at THIS administration by the above Commentater it becomes ALL too clear that the LEFT,, who Squalls CONSTANTLY that THEY suppo

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 23, 2008 | 10:07 PM

who Squalls CONSTANTLY that THEY support the troops,, don’t mind SACRIFICING those very SAME troops on their Alter of their Bush Hatred..

IF ONE AMERICAN SOLDIER should Perish as a result of this decision the responsibility shall NOT be SOLELY upon the head of that Terrorist released BACK onto the Battlefield to KILL Americans AGAIN but ALSO upon the heads of those who PUT HIM THERE and those who SUPPORT this Unprecedented Breach of Constitutional Law…

THIS,, more then ANYTHING else,, clearly underscores the NEED to,, at ALL cost,, make certain that a Liberal should NEVER again hold the office of the Presidency..It is PARAMOUNT that the NEXT President should appoint Supreme Court Justices who remember WHERE THEY COME FROM and what the Constitution REALLY says instead of what they THINK that it SHOULD say…..

sipedo read my blog view my photos
Jun 23, 2008 | 10:52 PM

If you see a terrorist, kill it, before it kills you, that is our only defense, since the Supreme Court is now become a legislative body.

Say what you want, but there is no such thing as a peaceful Muslim. No such animal. They want everyone dead who does not worship Allah. This country is on a slippery slope and is playing right into the hands of an extremist Islam.

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 1:00 AM

Let me tell you WHY this decision is Unconstitutional and Politically Motivated because it’s REAL simple...

The AMERICAN Judicial System HAS NO JURISDICTION over these people..

We have FOREIGN Citizens who are accused of committing “Crimes” IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY being held overseas in yet ANOTHER Foreign Country..The Supreme Court has ALREADY ruled once before that American Jurisprudence has NO Jurisdiction in these matters ..THIS decision rolled RIGHT over Supreme Court Precedence without so much as a by your leave..

These Terrorists BROKE no American Laws so how can they possibly be tried in American Courts..The answer is sinple,, THEY can’t and THEY won’t..THIS decision is NOT about THEIR trial..No such Trial will EVER happen..It SIMPLY can’t…

The WHOLE Purpose of this decision is to put AMERICA on trial, NOT the Terrorists..THIS isn’t about “rights”..It’s about Idealogue..it’s about Who’s FOR the War and Who’s AGAINST it..

Had THIS been a Constitutional Decision based Solely on the validity of the charges against the TERRORISTS ,, the decision would have included an ORDER for the detainees to be extradited to the Country where THEY commited their “crimes” to be tried according to THEIR Law…THAT at least,, would make SENSE and WOULD be Constitutional..THAT,,However,, would NEVER be allowed to happen…The left would SCREAM Bloody Murder at the mere suggestion of it....

THIS decision will see to it that THE TERRORISTS WILL NEVER Face Justice for their actions..

So what we have here is,, once again,, invented “Rights” found NOWHERE in the Constitution f

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 1:03 AM

for the SOLE Political Purpose of damaging the credibility of a Targeted ENEMY of the Liberal Left and it matters little to them WHO or WHAT else gets damaged in the Process,, be it America or her Men and Women in uniform,, or EVEN her Citizens...........

yellowdog read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 6:19 AM

Scalia is my role model for sure as what I want on the highest court, right ahead of Thomas as a Falwelian fascist. Talk about the wholesale murder of our Constitution, you may as well use the original document for toilet paper if you turn the interpretation over to these two guys.

If our resident goons had followed the barest requirement of International Law, we would not be in this situation. The rounded up a bunch of suspects (some guilty as sin and deserving to be convicted and hung like the dogs that they are...but some INNOCENT), shipped them off to be tortured and sometimes murdered in other countries and then jailed indefinately.

We brought this decision upon ourselves because of the egregious violation of International Law by Dick and Dumb.

If you really believe what you said speido, you are ignorant beyond redemption. Let me amend that statement : You ARE ignorant, beyond redemption, just for saying that (it makes no difference if you believe it or not).

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 6:56 AM

Don't worry Sipedo..EVERYBODY is considered Ignorant compared to Lord yellowdog'a Skewed vision....It's part of his fantasy...As YOU know,,it’s ALSO part of the Liberal Creed…

I find it interresting that the Local Self proclaimed “Expert” on the Constitution and NOW,,International Law,, should FAVOR such granting of Constitutioinal Rights to Foreign TERRORISTS while at the SAME time HE continues to refer to certain Republican Figures who have NEVER committed or have been charged with a sexual offense as “Sex Perverts”.. Seems the Constitutional concept of “Innocent until Proven Guilty” is to be Tossed out of the window in favor of “Guilty when the RUMORS start” for ALL but Terrorists and Democrats..Champion the Rights for TERRORISTS while you take them away from American Citizens..I said that it was interresting…It is NOT surprising..

IF there is indeed a violation of International Law then such violations have taken place in EVERY War and EVERY country EVER engaged IN those wars were and ARE guilty..There IS no such Violation..BUT,,IF there is a QUESTION in this area then International Law should have decided this,, NOT the Supreme Court of the United States..An out of Control Supreme Court overstepped their Authority and VIOLATED the Constitution in doing so....

As a result,,,

I would turn EVERY DAMN one of the Terrorists over to the Iraqi and Afghani Governments for Prosecution and Trial before I’d set them Free....

yellowdog read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:08 AM

As we should have done, not hold them on US soil, Guantanamo is a military leased land and despite the trickery of our deceivers, Afghanistan would have solved the problem...except for the fact that 1,500 terrorists were freed in a raid conducted by 40 Taliban ...the same Taliban who protected Osama and were allow to regroup and strenghten under the absolute and total idiocy of George (hang 'um high) Bush.

Or turn them over to the Egyptian or ANYBODY but our secret prison system. That exposes us to the requirements of our Constitution. The incompetence of OUR government led to this correct decision, not a liberal bunch of judges.

It is Ironic that non-citizens have some rights to fair treatment under our laws when Dumbo tries to deprive CITIZENS of their rights (Padilla).. Imagine that : treating your enemy fairly despite the fact that they are barbarians. I suppose it would benefit us to become barbarians too?

Despite the views of some totally ignorant bigots, we ARE better than that.

Trial, conviction and hanging of the guilty. That's all a civilized society demands.

dks75 read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:10 AM

I think the real problem is the inability to make exception to classify them properly, if we classify them one way we cant send them to trial. If we classify them the other way we need to give them basic rights.

If it was up to me we would not take any prisoners, then it would be done and over with :P

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:57 AM

Secret Prison System that EVERYBODY Knows about?? Really Yd..You REALLY must get e Grip on yourself..These outrageous claims of your's are getting quite BORING,, NOT to mention well past being rediculous..

YOU Dk,,are EXACTLY right..It was the LEFT that insisted that they NOT be classified as Prisoners of War because THAT would subject them to the VERY same "Held for the Duration" treatment that WAS and IS sanctioned by the Geneva Convention and applied to ALL such Prisoners..It was ALSO the Left that Didn’t want them sent to EITHER their Home Country or the countries where they committed their offenses claiming that THEY would be executed upon their conviction..THEY successfully convinced the courts that THAT would amount to Cruel and Unusual Punishment..A whole New Classification had to be created to satisfy the Left and STILL the LEFT objected.. THEY opposed Military Tribunals,,Demanding instead that THESE Terrorists be given UNCONSTITUTIONAL access to the revolving doors of the American Court System….. Remember..Though these guys were CAPTURED engaging in acts of WAR against Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan,, they nevertheless have violated NO domestic American Laws and the Court System has NO Jurisdiction…NO American Court can sit in Judgement of these Terrorists,,EVEN this recent decision falls short of granting them THAT authority..ANd like I said,,THAT WAS THEIR INTENTION...
Efforts IN CONGRESS and the White House have been CONSISTANTLY ongoing to find a solution to this Problem..THESE people were NOT Just “Held Indefinately” anymore then Padilla was..THEIR ex

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 9:02 AM

THESE people were NOT Just “Held Indefinately” anymore then Padilla was..THEIR extended detention without redress was the result of the actions of the LEFT who ultimately sought,, and it seems,, found a way to have them released..THAT was the ONLY acceptable solution for the LEFT..

Hawkeye read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 9:12 AM

You’ve got to remember another thing here DK..You need to go back to when this all started..back to 9/11..THESE Terrorists are the one’s that the left kept trying to convince we Americans that they were NOTHING more then Freedom Fighters..That they were NO different then OUR Minuteman of Revolutionary Fame..That THEY were the Modern day version of George Washington ,,Thomas Jefferson and the REST of the founding Fathers..That the TOWERS were REALLY,, after all,, Military targets..THESE guys are HEROS to the Yds of the World..THEY shouldn’t be detained at ALL,,THEY should be given PARADES..

ADeltonian read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 9:36 AM

How about taking them all to Somalia and let them loose in American uniforms.

Lets see how far they can get before they get knocked off.

RNC08 read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 10:12 AM

NO Yellow it is your side that has done ALL the damage to our constitution, in this very post you are demanding constitutional rights for enemy combatants who where arrested on foreign battle fields (most of them are multiple detainees who where found on the battle field more than once) by extending OUR constitution to cover every one you have included declared enemies of this country in its protection so it is you who has demanded that we embrace terrorist as “citizens” and give them the same rights as Americans....for the sole purpose of complaining that they are not being treated “fairly” ...you stuffed so much trash under our constitution it is ready to burst!

RNC08 read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 10:15 AM

another thing YD , you talk all the time about “crimes by this administration” against citizens but you have never produced one single victim of the BS you keep going on about...show me a US citizen who has been harmed by the Patriot act , or confess that it is the success of that law that most enrages you and all democrats! LOL@globalist scum!

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




jfore

I'm a new user who hasn’t written a bio yet.

Member Since: 11/1/2006