MyFox
 

theipp's Blog

by theipp from Brandon

Last Post 11 days, 2 hours Ago


Obamas popularity continues to grow, but does any one know what he stands for?
Mar 9, 2008 | 12:10 PM
Category: Political
Report This Post

I know Obama is promising change, and change could be great but it can also be devistating.Do we americans really want to risk it?

14 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 14
Page 1 of 1
savy0317
Mar 9, 2008 | 2:00 PM

Anything is better than this.
shorty62 read my blog
Mar 10, 2008 | 2:55 PM

If you like higher taxes,less money in your pocket,and the money taken out of your pocket given to say the UN to do with as they see fit.That is change I can do with out!!! Look at Senate Bill HR 2433 to see the types of change you will be getting..........:-(
Vittorio read my blog view my photos
Mar 10, 2008 | 7:55 PM

I've had enough living under National Socialism. Change looks good.
mmustangg read my blog view my photos
Mar 11, 2008 | 10:00 AM

The dumbest and most dangerous thing I have EVER read was just written in here when savy0317 posted.
"Anything is better than this."
Do you really mean anything? If that's true, I guess things are better in Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea etc? Think before you speak people or someone will think for you!
Venezuelan people wanted change too and look what they changed to! History is full of those who said "It could never happen here"!!

Vittorio..... You actually think you will get less socialisum under either Barock or Hillary? You'll get so much more you'll gag on it! Why do you think they both want to repeal the tax cuts? It's to they can spend the money on more failed social wellfair programs! Yes, sometimes change is good but it depends on what you change too!

One last thing. Other than taking back my tax cuts, does anyone know what Obama wants to change? Please dont say the way situation. That's taking care of itself. I just dont know what this guy wants to change so badly that it's become his campaign slogan.
mmustangg read my blog view my photos
Mar 11, 2008 | 10:04 AM

Ooops...make that the "war situation".
Dang typos! *lol*

***moves his Y key away from the R key***
Vittorio read my blog view my photos
Mar 11, 2008 | 4:25 PM

Vittorio..... You actually think you will get less socialisum under either Barock or Hillary?

National Socialism, not Socialism. Look it up. Hail Victory!
mmustangg read my blog view my photos
Mar 11, 2008 | 6:01 PM

Socialism is socialism same bent, slight change in angle though. And even if there are as different as you say, with the 2 on the left, we'll have good old fashion fork over your paycheck socialism.
mantink read my blog view my photos
Mar 12, 2008 | 5:07 AM

Hillary is Socialistic, Obama brings hope for change. Does ANYONE remember the 1st Clinton Administration? Those two Clintons systematically destroyed this country's togetherness and it hasn't been the same since. At least Obama brings HOPE, that's the key word. Nothing is for sure until it's written in stone. My support is with Obama. Clinton isn't worth a "Hill" of beans. She's to stereotypical for me and she will make this county worse and more vulnerable to terrorists. If she's this mean and horrible of a person on any given day, I'd hate to see her have PMS... or is it Menopausal at her age? SCARY thought!!!!
mmustangg read my blog view my photos
Mar 12, 2008 | 9:27 AM

mantink,

I think the comments about PMS and menopause are uncalled for and I'm not even a Hillary supporter. I'm not an Obama supporter either. I have YET to hear anyone tell me what kind of things he plans to change! Every candidate brings HOPE for change. I'll ask again, WHAT KIND OF CHANGE! Change for change sake isn't always a good thing. Read the post I started about 401K's and IRA's and you'll get my point. I would like to examine what Obama wants to change BEFORE it's written in stone!
mantink read my blog view my photos
Mar 12, 2008 | 4:09 PM

mmusgangg,

I understand what you're saying. I'm technically not a supporter of either of them, but If I had to choose only between those two, I'd choose Obama. Hillary's change isn't specific nor is Obama's, but to be honest, what has McCain said he'd change? I don't see it anywhere. I still think with Hillary's anger towards everyone, even her own party, her history with WalMart and her false claims, we'd be a highly vulnerable country. Especially if she has a "bad day." She seems to have more bad days than most women...
mmustangg read my blog view my photos
Mar 12, 2008 | 4:29 PM

mantink

I think Hillary's worst day was the day she said "I do". As for the changes, did you read my blog about the IRAs and 401Ks? Obama wants us to have manditory retirement accounts. I thought we had that in social security taxes? If he forces every employer to match funds, you'll see wholesale layoffs and wage cuts. I know one thing McCain DOESN'T want to change. He doesn't want to take away the tax cuts we all got. Obama wants to CHANGE your taxes by taking more of what you earn. Do you want that? They always preface the removing the tax cuts by saying they are taking them away from the wealthy. Well I dont give a rat's butt how wealthy someone is. The wealthy spend money in places that employ the rest of us. When the wealthy do well, we all do well. Remember, the 5% of wage earners(the wealthy) pay 90% of the taxes. across the board tax hikes only hurt the other 95% of us! That's the kind of change Obama wants.

This country doesn't need a Robin Hood, it needs a talanted CEO to guide the company called USA inc.! A company that we are both stockholders in! Sadly, I dont think McCain is that either but at least he doesn't want to raise our taxes.

Change for change sake might leave you with change in your pocket.
mantink read my blog view my photos
Mar 12, 2008 | 8:12 PM

I agree with you, that's why I voted for Romney. I wasn't able to find youre 401K and IRA part. I missed it somewhere, but I'll go back and look again.
I believe Romney could've been very good as a President because he not only has been a Governor, he has run businesses. He has the "business sense" to run this country. I feel that running the U.S. is like running an extremely large business. Hillary can't do it, she hasn't run anything in her life. She can't run a corner store, how can she run our country. She is very socialistic and we need democracy not socialism.
Hillary only said, "I do" because she wanted to be the first woman president. People who actually get off their butts and go vote against Hillary will keep her sorry dreams from happening... Especially if they want to stay a free democracy.
koolmom21
Mar 25, 2008 | 6:32 PM

Sen. Obama stayed in that church because he liked what he heard. He chosen Rev.Wright to be his mentor because he liked what he heard. Do not even try to say the White race has not been abuse by our country and by the African American people. How do you think we feel when we lived in a community for 50+ years and then the African American people move in and take over. It is not because the African America people are black it is because they have no respect for us or our communities. Just like allot of the African American people have no respect for their own communities. For many years they live somewhere and after it turns into a drug infested torn down town-they move into a community that the White race worked very hard to make. This has been going on MANY MANY years! Our homes are finally starting to be paid for and retirement is just a few years away and then the African American people take over and we HAVE TO START OVER. DO YOU THINK THIS IS FAIR ??? We would like for our nation to help us when this happens but guess what -THEY DO NOT! We lose EVERYTHING we worked for all our lives. You may not know but many people can not sell their homes at all when that happens .AGAIN -do you think that is fair?
Now comes the big but-we do not go to church and vent our anger. We go to church to worship GOD and to come together in peace with one another.
I believe there are more African American people that are hateful then there are in The White race community. I do not believe it is most but it is allot. Look at the age of the young men and some women who latch out at their comm
koolmom21
Mar 25, 2008 | 6:34 PM

part 2
I do not believe it is most but it is allot. Look at the age of the young men and some women who latch out at their communities. Most are between 12 and 25 years old. In this group there are some that are even younger and some that are older. Anger grows in the souls of some people and it began when they where young.
If you listen to people like Rev.Wright-Know wonder this is so widespread in the African American people. If I had to sit and listen to my preacher tell me that the land that I live on and the people of my country hate me- I would be angry and stirred up also. When anyone is stirred up and have no outlet for it-it comes out in other ways. It would make my blood boil !!!

Rev.Wright has been Sen.Obama’s mentor for 20 years. I believe and many people NOW wonder-how much is his blood boiling as he quietly reads his speeches to the nation?

Allot of people can no longer trust him. Not to mention his back and forth lies.

“No I was unaware of” or “no I never heard” or “yes I found out then” and then finally “well-of coarse I knew”.

I wish we all could do a do over vote. I think the outcome would have been very different.
He thinks Sen Clinton was misleading the voters-LMAO
I feel so betrayed.
Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




theipp

Im a student at bloomingdale high school. Im 17 years old.I write the blogs you may have seen in my spare time in school.Im a fan of sports such as football.My favorite teams are the Bucs,the Gators,and the colts.

Member Since: 2/23/2008


 

RSS: XMLWhat is RSS?